Proving Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors for T and T*: A Comprehensive Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalue Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
mathboy
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I know that if T has eigenvalue k, then T* has eigenvalue k bar. But if T has eigenvector x, does T* also have eigenvector x? If so, how do you prove it? I don't see that in my textbook.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no proof because it is not true. For example, if
[tex]T= \left[\begin{array}{cc}0 & i \\i & 0\end{array}right][/tex]
Then T has eigenvalue i, with eigenvecor [a, a] and eigenvalue -i with eigenvector [1, -1].
[tex]T*= \left[\begin{array}{cc}0 & -i \\ -i & 0\end{array}\right][/tex]
which also eigenvalue i but now with eigenvectors [a, -a] and eigenvalue -i with eigenvectors [a, a].
 
Ok, I just read that it is true if T is a normal operator. Thanks.
 
morphism said:
What about the converse? Namely, if T and T* share their eigenvectors, is T necessarily normal?

I don't know if you are asking rhetorically or not. But my textbook doesn't state the converse.