Proving Even Parity for this Expression

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation of derivatives under parity in quantum field theory. The expression presented shows that the transformation of the derivative operator should be ##\partial_\mu \mapsto \partial^\mu##, which aligns with the behavior of contravariant and covariant vectors. The confusion arises from the incorrect assumption that ##\partial_\mu## should pick up a negative sign under parity. The correct understanding is that under parity transformations, the components of four-vectors switch between covariant and contravariant forms without introducing a sign change.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with four-vectors and their transformations
  • Knowledge of covariant and contravariant vector notation
  • Basic grasp of parity transformations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of contravariant and covariant vectors in detail
  • Research parity transformations and their implications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical framework of quantum field theory
  • Examine examples of four-vector transformations in various physical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, students studying advanced physics concepts, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Prove that
$$\bar { \psi } ( x ) \gamma ^ { \mu } \partial _ { \mu } \psi ( x )$$
has even parity for ##\gamma^\mu## a set of matrices satisfying the Clifford algebra and ##\psi## a bispinor (an element that transforms under the ##(\frac{1}{2},0)\oplus (0,\frac{1}{2} )## representation of the Lorentz group) and ##\bar\psi=\psi^\dagger\gamma^0## the adjoint spinor.
Relevant Equations
Not entirely sure but I think if we write ##\psi## in terms of left/right-handed Wely spinors the parity operation is given by
##\psi(x)\longmapsto \psi'(x')=\gamma^0\psi(x).##
My idea was straight forward calculation:
$$\begin{align*}\bar { \psi }' ( x' ) \gamma ^ { \mu } \partial _ { \mu }' \psi ( x' ) &= \psi^\dagger\gamma^{0\dagger}\gamma^0\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu'\gamma^0\psi = \bar\psi\underbrace{\gamma^0\gamma^\mu\gamma^0}_{=\gamma^{\mu\dagger}=-\gamma^\mu} \partial_\mu'\psi = - \bar\psi\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu'\psi\\
&\overset{!}{=}\bar { \psi } ( x ) \gamma ^ { \mu } \partial _ { \mu } \psi ( x ) .\end{align*}$$
For this to be true the parity should therefore transform ##\partial_\mu\mapsto -\partial_\mu## which doesn't really make sense to me (I can't see why ##\partial_0## should pick up a sign under parity).. I found in a post here on physics formus (I sadly can't find the link right now) that ##\partial_\mu\mapsto\partial^\mu## under parity, which honestly confused me completely...

I assume that I'm doing something completely wrong, but I just don't really see what...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The correct transformation is indeed ##\partial_\mu\mapsto\partial^\mu##. This is the natural result when you consider that the components of the four-vector ##\partial^\mu## transform as the components of a contravariant vector, while the components of the four-vector ##\partial_\mu## transform as the components of a covariant vector. Under a parity transformation, the contravariant components of a four-vector are simply exchanged with the covariant components, so we have ##\partial^\mu\mapsto\partial_\mu## and ##\partial_\mu\mapsto\partial^\mu##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
95
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K