Proving f(0)=f(1) in the Sierpinski Topology with a Continuous Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted123
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
12 replies · 4K views
Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let [itex]X=\{0,1\}[/itex] with the Sierpinski topology [itex]\tau = \{ \emptyset , \{0\} ,\{0,1\} \}[/itex].

Suppose [itex]f:X\to \mathbb{R}[/itex] is continuous.

Show [itex]f(0)=f(1)[/itex].

[Potentially useful observation: [itex]\{f(0)\}[/itex] is closed in [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex].]

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]f:X\to\mathbb{R}[/itex] is continuous [itex]\iff[/itex] for every open (closed) set [itex]A\subseteq \mathbb{R},\;f^*(A)[/itex] is open (closed) in [itex]X[/itex].

How to show f(0)=f(1)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose the contrary, and find an open set whose preimage is {1}.
 
Citan Uzuki said:
Suppose the contrary, and find an open set whose preimage is {1}.

Does [itex]f^*(\{0\}) = \{1\}[/itex]?
 
Ted123 said:
Does [itex]f^*(\{0\}) = \{1\}[/itex]?

Who could say until you define what f is?? Follow Citan Uzuki's advice and define f(0)=a and f(1)=b where a and b are unequal real numbers. Is f continuous?
 
Dick said:
Who could say until you define what f is?? Follow Citan Uzuki's advice and define f(0)=a and f(1)=b where a and b are unequal real numbers. Is f continuous?

So [itex]\{a\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/itex] and [itex]\{b\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/itex] are closed, and [itex]f^*(\{a\})=\{0\} \subseteq X[/itex] is closed in [itex]X[/itex] but [itex]f^*(\{a\})=\{1\}[/itex] is not closed in [itex]X[/itex] so [itex]f[/itex] is not continuous - contradiction; therefore [itex]f(0)=f(1)[/itex]?
 
Ted123 said:
So [itex]\{a\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/itex] and [itex]\{b\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/itex] are closed, and [itex]f^*(\{a\})=\{0\} \subseteq X[/itex] is closed in [itex]X[/itex] but [itex]f^*(\{a\})=\{1\}[/itex] is not closed in [itex]X[/itex] so [itex]f[/itex] is not continuous - contradiction; therefore [itex]f(0)=f(1)[/itex]?

^ That should say [itex]f^*(\{b\})=\{1\}[/itex] but I can't find an edit button!
 
Ted123 said:
So [itex]\{a\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/itex] and [itex]\{b\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}[/itex] are closed, and [itex]f^*(\{a\})=\{0\} \subseteq X[/itex] is closed in [itex]X[/itex] but [itex]f^*(\{a\})=\{1\}[/itex] is not closed in [itex]X[/itex] so [itex]f[/itex] is not continuous - contradiction; therefore [itex]f(0)=f(1)[/itex]?

Right. Now to finish up show that if a=b then f IS continuous.
 
That approach will work, but you're doing it backwards. {0} is not closed in X, because its complement is {1}, which is not in the topology on X. So the conclusion that f is not continuous comes from the fact that f*({a}) = 0, not the fact that f*({b}) = 1.
 
Ted123 said:
^ That should say [itex]f^*(\{b\})=\{1\}[/itex] but I can't find an edit button!

Yeah, actually I didn't notice, but you right. My 'Edit' button disappeared for a while yesterday. Seems to be back now. At least for me. Citan Uzuki is also right. I didn't notice you'd swapped the open and closed either. Guess I should read more carefully.
 
Dick said:
Yeah, actually I didn't notice, but you right. My 'Edit' button disappeared for a while yesterday. Seems to be back now. At least for me. Citan Uzuki is also right. I didn't notice you'd swapped the open and closed either. Guess I should read more carefully.

If we have a contradiction after supposing [itex]a\neq b[/itex] doesn't that mean we must have [itex]a=b[/itex]?
 
Ted123 said:
If we have a contradiction after supposing [itex]a\neq b[/itex] doesn't that mean we must have [itex]a=b[/itex]?

No! All you've shown is that if a not equal b is then f is not continuous. How can that be a proof that if a=b then f is continuous? There might not be ANY continuous functions.
 
Dick said:
No! All you've shown is that if a not equal b is then f is not continuous. How can that be a proof that if a=b then f is continuous? There might not be ANY continuous functions.

But we're assuming all along that [itex]f:X\to \mathbb{R}[/itex] is continuous (as the question tells us this!)
 
Ted123 said:
But we're assuming all along that [itex]f:X\to \mathbb{R}[/itex] is continuous (as the question tells us this!)

Ok, this is really not my day. You are right. I thought you had to prove f continuous iff a=b. I saw the double arrow in your original post and fixated on it.