Proving f^-1(Y ∩ Z) = f^-1(Y) ∩ f^-1(Z)

  • Thread starter Thread starter cateater2000
  • Start date Start date
cateater2000
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi

let f be a function from set A into X, and Y,Z c X. Prove the following

f^-1(YandZ)=f^-1(Y)andf^-1(Z);

any tips would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you need to prove that two sets are equal, A = B, as in your problem the simplest trick you can use is to show that any a \in A is also an element of B and viceversa.
 
I'm really confused with how to do it with function inverses, thanks for the help i'll try to figure it out
 
cateater2000 said:
Hi

let f be a function from set A into X, and Y,Z c X. Prove the following

f^-1(YandZ)=f^-1(Y)andf^-1(Z);

any tips would be great
I think you mean that f is a one-to one function from A to X. Is that what you mean by "into"? Also, I think you mean that Y and Z are both subsets of X. Stop me if I'm wrong.

Let x∈f^-1(Y ^ Z). We wish to show that x∈f^-1(Y)&f^-1(Z). Then once we do that, we wish to start by letting x be in f^-1(Y)&f^-1(Z) and show that that implies x∈f^-1(Y ^ Z).

This is what the last poster was writing about.

Now the thing to remember is that x∈f^-1(U) if and only if f(x)∈U.
 
I think he does not mean the function is one to one, but "and" seems to mean intersection. and f^(-1) just means preimage.


then this is a corolalary of the usual tautological fact that pullback or inverse image of sets is a boolean homomorphism, i.e. preserves both intersections and unions.
 
Hey thanks for youe help I got it now. It's actually really easy thankyou very much :)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top