Proving f^-1(Y ∩ Z) = f^-1(Y) ∩ f^-1(Z)

  • Thread starter Thread starter cateater2000
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equality f^-1(Y ∩ Z) = f^-1(Y) ∩ f^-1(Z) for a function f from set A to X, with Y and Z as subsets of X. Participants clarify the definitions and properties of function inverses, emphasizing that proving set equality involves demonstrating mutual inclusion. The key insight is that x belongs to f^-1(U) if and only if f(x) is in U, which aids in the proof. The conversation highlights the concept that the inverse image of sets preserves intersections, a fundamental property in set theory. Ultimately, the original poster expresses gratitude for the clarification and confirms understanding of the proof.
cateater2000
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi

let f be a function from set A into X, and Y,Z c X. Prove the following

f^-1(YandZ)=f^-1(Y)andf^-1(Z);

any tips would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you need to prove that two sets are equal, A = B, as in your problem the simplest trick you can use is to show that any a \in A is also an element of B and viceversa.
 
I'm really confused with how to do it with function inverses, thanks for the help i'll try to figure it out
 
cateater2000 said:
Hi

let f be a function from set A into X, and Y,Z c X. Prove the following

f^-1(YandZ)=f^-1(Y)andf^-1(Z);

any tips would be great
I think you mean that f is a one-to one function from A to X. Is that what you mean by "into"? Also, I think you mean that Y and Z are both subsets of X. Stop me if I'm wrong.

Let x∈f^-1(Y ^ Z). We wish to show that x∈f^-1(Y)&f^-1(Z). Then once we do that, we wish to start by letting x be in f^-1(Y)&f^-1(Z) and show that that implies x∈f^-1(Y ^ Z).

This is what the last poster was writing about.

Now the thing to remember is that x∈f^-1(U) if and only if f(x)∈U.
 
I think he does not mean the function is one to one, but "and" seems to mean intersection. and f^(-1) just means preimage.


then this is a corolalary of the usual tautological fact that pullback or inverse image of sets is a boolean homomorphism, i.e. preserves both intersections and unions.
 
Hey thanks for youe help I got it now. It's actually really easy thankyou very much :)
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top