Proving Finite Order Elements Form a Subgroup of an Abelian Group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The collection of all finite order elements in an abelian group, denoted as H, is indeed a subgroup of G. The proof demonstrates that for any elements a and b in H, their product ab^{-1} also belongs to H, confirming that H is closed under the group operation. The key steps include showing that if a^n = e and b^m = e for some integers n and m, then (ab^{-1})^{mn} = e, utilizing the abelian property of G. Thus, H is a subgroup of G, denoted as H ≤ G.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically abelian groups.
  • Familiarity with the concept of finite order elements in groups.
  • Knowledge of subgroup criteria and closure properties.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of group elements and operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of abelian groups in detail.
  • Learn about the concept of finite order elements and their significance in group theory.
  • Explore subgroup criteria and theorems related to group operations.
  • Investigate examples of abelian groups and their finite order elements.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, group theory enthusiasts, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of subgroup properties in abelian groups.

rideabike
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove the collection of all finite order elements in an abelian group, G, is a subgroup of G.

The Attempt at a Solution


Let H={x\inG : x is finite} with a,b \inH.
Then a^{n}=e and b^{m}=e for some n,m.
And b^{-1}\inH. (Can I just say this?)
Hence (ab^{-1})^{mn}=a^{mn}b^{-mn}=e^{m}e^{n}=e (Since G is abelian the powers can be distributed like that)

So ab^{-1}\inH, and H≤G.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
rideabike said:

Homework Statement


Prove the collection of all finite order elements in an abelian group, G, is a subgroup of G.

The Attempt at a Solution


Let H={x\inG : x is finite} with a,b \inH.
Then a^{n}=e and b^{m}=e for some n,m.
And b^{-1}\inH. (Can I just say this?)
If you're going to say it, you should justify it. But your proof below doesn't use this fact. (Indeed, it proves it!)
Hence (ab^{-1})^{mn}=a^{mn}b^{-mn}=e^{m}e^{n}=e (Since G is abelian the powers can be distributed like that)

So ab^{-1}\inH, and H≤G.
This part is fine. Note that as a special case, this shows that ##b^{-1} \in H##. (Take ##a = e##.) You didn't need to stipulate ##b^{-1}\in H## in the previously quoted section.
 
rideabike said:
Delete thread, figured it out
We don't delete threads once they have a response.

Thank you jbunniii!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K