Proving g°f is Onto: Showing the Ontoness of Composed Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the composition of two onto functions, g°f, is also onto. The functions are defined as f:X→Y and g:Y→Z.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the definitions of onto functions and the logical structure of the proof. There is a focus on the precision of language used in mathematical statements.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the clarity of the original poster's statements, emphasizing the importance of precise language in proofs. There is an ongoing exploration of how to articulate the proof correctly, with suggestions for refining the initial approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of mathematical definitions and proof writing, indicating a potential learning curve in formal proof techniques.

charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If f and g are both onto show g°f is onto.

f:X→Y and g:Y→Z



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Since f is onto then there exists an x in X such that f(x) = y, for all y in Y.

Since g is onto then there exists a y in Y such that g(y) =z for all z in Z.

Hence, if g°f is not onto then there exists a z in Z such that there is no corresponding x in X. But since g and f are onto this is not possible. Therefore, g°f is onto.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your basic idea is correct. However, I would be careful with how exactly you write this out. Your first statement, "Since f is onto then there exists an x in X such that f(x) = y, for all y in Y" is not quite correct. The way you have it arranged, it reads as if there is one specific x in X that maps to all values of y in Y.

Of course this is not what you mean, but if you're starting out with proofs (which I'm assuming you are) then it is good to be precise at first. "For a given y in Y, there exists some x in X such that f(x) = y."

Hope that helps!
 
zooxanthellae said:
Your basic idea is correct. However, I would be careful with how exactly you write this out. Your first statement, "Since f is onto then there exists an x in X such that f(x) = y, for all y in Y" is not quite correct. The way you have it arranged, it reads as if there is one specific x in X that maps to all values of y in Y.

Of course this is not what you mean, but if you're starting out with proofs (which I'm assuming you are) then it is good to be precise at first. "For a given y in Y, there exists some x in X such that f(x) = y."

Hope that helps!

Ok thanks that makes a lot more sense, noted!
 
Just pick an arbitrary z ∊ Z . It's pretty straight forward to show that there is some x ∊ X , such that g(f(x)) = z .
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K