Proving Geodesics in Hyperbolic Geometry

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a demicircle centered on the x-axis in hyperbolic geometry is a geodesic. Participants explore the geodesic equations derived from a specific metric and engage in technical reasoning regarding the calculations of derivatives and Christoffel symbols.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the metric ##ds^2 = y^{-2}(dx^2 + dy^2)## and attempts to show that the parametric equations for the demicircle yield geodesics.
  • Another participant points out the need to be careful with the signs in the calculations, specifically regarding ##dy^2##.
  • There are multiple attempts to compute ##ds## in terms of ##d\theta##, with varying results and corrections suggested by others.
  • One participant argues that the approach of finding an induced metric on the circle may not suffice, emphasizing the need to consider the original coordinate system for the Christoffel symbols.
  • Another participant suggests that the curve may be a non-affinely parametrized geodesic, which would require reparametrization to satisfy the geodesic equation.
  • Discussions include the derivatives of the parametric equations and their implications for the geodesic equations, with some participants expressing confusion about the results and seeking clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the validity of the approach taken to prove the geodesics, with some agreeing on the need for careful calculations while others challenge the methodology. The discussion remains unresolved as participants explore various aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the parametrization and the implications of the derived equations. The discussion highlights the complexity of the geodesic equations and the need for precise handling of mathematical expressions.

ChrisJ
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Given ##ds^2 = y^{-2}(dx^2 + dy^2)##, I am trying to prove that a demicircle centred on the x-axis, written parametrically as ##x=r\cos\theta + x_0 ## and ##y= r \sin \theta ## are geodesics. Where ##r## is constant and ##\theta \in (0,\pi)##

I have already found the general form of the geodesic equation for this metric by finding the christoffell symbols,

<br /> 0 = \frac{d^2x}{ds^2} - \frac{2}{y}\frac{dx}{ds}\frac{dy}{ds} \\<br /> 0 = \frac{d^2y}{ds^2} - \frac{1}{y} \left( \frac{dy}{ds} \right)^2 + \frac{1}{y}\left( \frac{dx}{ds} \right)^2<br />Then I was not exactly sure where to go from here, but just started spitballing,

<br /> dx = -r \sin \theta d\theta\\<br /> dy = r \cos \theta d\theta\\<br /> ds^2 = \left( \frac{1}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta } \right) \left( -r^2 \sin^2 \theta d\theta^2 + r^2 \cos^2 \theta d \theta^2 \right) \\<br /> ds^2 = (\cot^2 \theta- 1 ) d\theta^2 \\<br /> ds = \sqrt{\cot^2 \theta-1} d\theta<br />

Am I even on the right track here? Any help/advice is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take good care of sign of ##dy^2##. The fifth line is ds^2=cosec^2\theta d\theta<br /> ^2
 
sweet springs said:
Take good care of sign of ##dy^2##. The fifth line is ds^2=cosec^2\theta d\theta<br /> ^2

Sorry, I cannot see that?

What I did was this,
<br /> ds^2 = \left( \frac{1}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta } \right) \left( -r^2 \sin^2 \theta d\theta^2 + r^2 \cos^2 \theta d \theta^2 \right) \\<br /> ds^2 = \frac{-r^2 \sin^2 \theta d\theta^2}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta} + \frac{r^2 \cos^2 \theta d \theta^2}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta} \\<br /> ds^2 = -1 d\theta^2 + \cot^2 d \theta^2 \\<br /> ds^2 = (\cot^2 \theta - 1) d \theta^2<br />
 
What is your idea behind computing ##ds## in terms of ##d\theta##? How is it going to help you find out whether or not your curves are geodesics? (I am not saying it doesn't, just asking for your rationale.)

I also agree with @sweet springs , you need to be more careful with your signs. Note that ##(-1)^2 = 1## and not ##-1##.
 
Orodruin said:
What is your idea behind computing ##ds## in terms of ##d\theta##? How is it going to help you find out whether or not your curves are geodesics? (I am not saying it doesn't, just asking for your rationale.)

I also agree with @sweet springs , you need to be more careful with your signs. Note that ##(-1)^2 = 1## and not ##-1##.

The idea was to find ##ds^2=##...##d\theta^2## to then find the non-vansihing christoffel symbols of metric in terms of ##\theta## to plug into new geodesic equation.

This is what I have done so far now, leaving where last post left off and fixing mistake

<br /> ds^2 = \left( \frac{1}{r^2 \sin^2 \theta } \right) \left( r^2 \sin^2 \theta d\theta^2 + r^2 \cos^2 \theta d \theta^2 \right) \\<br /> ds^2 = d\theta^2 + \cot^2 d \theta^2 \\<br /> ds= \sqrt{(\cot^2 \theta + 1)} d \theta \\<br /> ds = \csc \theta d\theta \\<br /> ds^2 = \csc^2 d\theta^2<br /> <br />

Then I can write a new tensor metric as such

<br /> <br /> g_{\alpha\beta} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \csc^2 \theta \end{pmatrix} \\<br /> g^{\alpha\beta} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \sin^2 \theta \end{pmatrix} \\<br /> \\<br /> \Gamma^{\theta}_{\theta\theta} = \frac{1}{2} \sin^2 \theta \left( - \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \csc^2 \theta \right) \\<br /> \Gamma^{\theta}_{\theta\theta} = \sin^2 \theta \cot^2 \theta \csc^2 \theta = \cot^2 \theta \\<br />

Then new geodesic equation becomes, noting that since ##ds=\csc \theta d\theta## that ##d\theta = \sin \theta ds##...
<br /> 0= \frac{d^2\theta}{ds^2} - \Gamma^{\theta}_{\theta\theta} \left( \frac{d\theta}{ds} \right)^2 \\<br /> 0=\frac{d}{ds}\left( \sin \theta \right) - \left( \cot^2 \theta \right) \left( \sin^2 \theta \right) \\<br /> 0=\cos \theta \sin \theta - \cos^2 \theta<br />

Which does not equal zero. Any help is really appreciated. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
ChrisJ said:
The idea was to find ds2=ds2=ds^2=...dθ2dθ2d\theta^2 to then find the non-vansihing christoffel symbols of metric in terms of θθ\theta to plug into new geodesic equation.
This will not work. All you are doing is getting an induced metric on the circle. Your manifold has two coordinates and the metric is non-degenerate.

You need to find the Christoffel symbols in your original coordinate system (or another coordinate system on your original manifold) and show that the curve is a geodesic. Note that a curve can be a non-affinely parametrised geodesic, which means that it will not satisfy the geodesic equation directly, but can be made to do so by a reparametrisation.
 
Orodruin said:
This will not work. All you are doing is getting an induced metric on the circle. Your manifold has two coordinates and the metric is non-degenerate.

You need to find the Christoffel symbols in your original coordinate system (or another coordinate system on your original manifold) and show that the curve is a geodesic. Note that a curve can be a non-affinely parametrised geodesic, which means that it will not satisfy the geodesic equation directly, but can be made to do so by a reparametrisation.

Oh, bugger. Ok thanks.

Well the geodesic equation, given the chrsitoffel symbols to the original coordinate system is as follows
<br /> 0 = \frac{d^2x}{ds^2} - \frac{2}{y}\frac{dx}{ds}\frac{dy}{ds} \\<br /> 0 = \frac{d^2y}{ds^2} - \frac{1}{y} \left( \frac{dy}{ds} \right)^2 + \frac{1}{y}\left( \frac{dx}{ds} \right)^2<br />

are you saying that I need to work the following out?
<br /> 0 = \frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{d}{ds} \left( r \cos \theta + x_0 \right) \right) - \frac{2}{r \sin \theta} \left( \frac{d}{ds} (r \cos \theta + x_0) \right) \left( \frac{d}{ds}r\sin \theta \right) \\<br /> 0 = \frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{d}{ds} r \sin \theta \right) - \frac{1}{r\sin \theta} \left( \frac{d}{ds} r\sin \theta \right)^2 + \frac{1}{r \sin \theta} \left(\frac{d}{ds} (r \cos \theta + x_0) \right)^2<br />
 
ChrisJ said:
are you saying that I need to work the following out?
Yes. This should not be too difficult seeing that there is only one variable (the curve parameter ##\theta##). Do not forget that ##\theta## is not necessarily an affine parameter.
 
Orodruin said:
Yes. This should not be too difficult seeing that there is only one variable (the curve parameter ##\theta##). Do not forget that ##\theta## is not necessarily an affine parameter.

ok its been a while since I've done implicit differentiation, but am I correct in thinking that, for example ##\frac{d}{ds} r \sin \theta = r \cos \theta \frac{d\theta}{ds} = r \cos \theta \sin \theta ##

Since in my wrong method above I found that ##\frac{d\theta}{ds}= \sin \theta ##
 
  • #10
ChrisJ said:
ok its been a while since I've done implicit differentiation, but am I correct in thinking that, for example ##\frac{d}{ds} r \sin \theta = r \cos \theta \frac{d\theta}{ds} = r \cos \theta \sin \theta ##

Since in my wrong method above I found that ##\frac{d\theta}{ds}= \sin \theta ##
Yes, this would amount to implicitly reparametrising the curve with the path length ##s##.
 
  • #11
Orodruin said:
Yes, this would amount to implicitly reparametrising the curve with the path length ##s##.

Ok, I think I am having a bit of trouble here, does not seem to equal zero the way I'm doing it.

I found all the derivatives I need separately to make it clearer, then plug in at the end.
<br /> \frac{d}{ds} r \sin \theta = r \cos \theta \frac{d\theta}{ds} = r \cos \theta \sin \theta \\<br /> \frac{d}{ds}(r \cos \theta + x_0) =- r \sin \theta \frac{d\theta}{ds} = -r \sin^2 \theta \\<br /> \frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{d}{ds} \left( r \cos \theta + x_0 \right) \right) = \frac{d}{ds} \left( r \sin^2 \theta \right) = (-r \cos \theta \sin \theta + r \sin\theta \cos \theta) \frac{d\theta}{ds} = 0 \\<br /> \frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{d}{ds} r \sin \theta \right) = \frac{d}{ds}(r \cos \theta \sin \theta) = (r \sin^2 \theta - r \sin^2 \theta) \frac{d\theta}{ds} =0<br />

So both of the second derivative in the geodesic equations equal zero, and just need to focus on the single derivatives. So,
<br /> 0 = \frac{d}{ds} \left( \frac{d}{ds} \left( r \cos \theta + x_0 \right) \right) - \frac{2}{r \sin \theta} \left( \frac{d}{ds} (r \cos \theta + x_0) \right) \left( \frac{d}{ds}r\sin \theta \right) \\<br /> 0 = -\frac{2}{r\sin \theta} \left( -r \sin^2 \theta \right) \left( r \cos \theta \sin \theta \right) \\<br /> 0 = 2r \sin^2 \theta \cos \theta<br />

and the other one..
<br /> 0 = \frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{d}{ds} r \sin \theta \right) - \frac{1}{r\sin \theta} \left( \frac{d}{ds} r\sin \theta \right)^2 + \frac{1}{r \sin \theta} \left(\frac{d}{ds} (r \cos \theta + x_0) \right)^2 \\<br /> 0 =- \frac{1}{r \sin\theta} \left( r \cos \theta \sin \theta \right)^2 + \frac{1}{r \sin\theta} ( -r \sin^2 \theta )^2 \\<br /> 0 = -r \cos^2 \theta \sin \theta + r \sin^3 \theta<br />
 
Last edited:
  • #12
ChrisJ said:
0=dds(sinθ)−(cot2θ)(sin2θ)
0=cosθsinθ−cosθ​
I do not follow physical meaning but there is a mistake in your calculation. From the top one
cos\theta(\frac{d\theta}{ds}-cos\theta)=0
ds=\frac{d\theta}{cos\theta}
s=\frac{1}{2}log|\frac{1+sin\theta}{1-sin\theta}|+C
 
  • #13
sweet springs said:
I do not follow physical meaning but there is a mistake in your calculation. From the top one
ds=\frac{d\theta}{cos\theta}

Where did you get that from? From post 5, it can be seen that

ds^2 = \csc^2 \theta d\theta^2 \\<br /> ds = \csc \theta d \theta \\<br /> ds = \frac{d\theta}{\sin \theta}<br />
 
  • #14
I've got it from your
0=\frac{d}{ds}(sin\theta)-cot^2\theta sin^2\theta
Could you elaborate which equation is a right one?
 
  • #15
sweet springs said:
I've got it from your
0=\frac{d}{ds}(sin\theta)-cot^2\theta sin^2\theta
Could you elaborate which equation is a right one?

Oh right ok, there might be an error there somewhere but that is a wrong method anyway. As per post 6 onwards tried to go about the problem from a different angle as per Orodruin's suggestion. However, I am pretty certain that ##\frac{d\theta}{ds} = \sin \theta ##, which that bit is still needed in new method.
 
  • #16
If you are certain about that formula why do not you integtrate immediately to get
s=\frac{1}{2}log|\frac{1-cos\theta}{1+cos\theta}|+C?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K