Proving inf(ST) = inf(S)*inf(T)

  • Thread starter Thread starter faceblah
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality inf(C) = inf(S) * inf(T) for sets S and T of positive real numbers, where C is defined as the set of products of elements from S and T.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to establish both inequalities: inf(C) ≤ inf(S) * inf(T) and inf(C) ≥ inf(S) * inf(T). They are using epsilon to explore bounds and questioning the validity of certain inequalities in their reasoning.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the inequalities, particularly in combining results and considering the implications of epsilon. There is ongoing exploration of the correct application of limits and inequalities.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about specific inequalities and the implications of limits as epsilon approaches zero. There is also mention of the need for clarity in logical implications regarding the relationships between infimum values.

faceblah
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sets A and B are sets of positive real numbers. Define C = {st| s \in S and t \in T}
Prove inf(C) = inf(S)*inf(T)

The Attempt at a Solution



so I'm trying to prove inf(C) <= inf(S)*inf(T) and inf(C) >= inf(S)*inf(T).

i'll use e as epsilon. epsilon is positive

By definition there is an s in S such that: s < inf S + e. There is a t in T such that: t < inf T + e. Additionally, inf(C) <= st for all s in S and t in T by definition.

st < (inf S + e)(inf T + e) = (inf S)(inf T) + (inf S)*e + (inf T)*e + e^2

inf C <= st <= (inf S)(inf T) < inf S)(inf T) + (inf S)*e + (inf T)*e + e^2
(NOTE: I'm not sure about the middle inequality: "st <= (inf S)(inf T)" )

is this a correct way to go about this? I'm also not sure about proving the other direction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
faceblah said:

Homework Statement



Sets A and B are sets of positive real numbers. Define C = {st| s \in S and t \in T}
Prove inf(C) = inf(S)*inf(T)

The Attempt at a Solution



so I'm trying to prove inf(C) <= inf(S)*inf(T) and inf(C) >= inf(S)*inf(T).

i'll use e as epsilon. epsilon is positive

By definition there is an s in S such that: s < inf S + e. There is a t in T such that: t < inf T + e. Additionally, inf(C) <= st for all s in S and t in T by definition.

st < (inf S + e)(inf T + e) = (inf S)(inf T) + (inf S)*e + (inf T)*e + e^2

inf C <= st <= (inf S)(inf T) < inf S)(inf T) + (inf S)*e + (inf T)*e + e^2
(NOTE: I'm not sure about the middle inequality: "st <= (inf S)(inf T)" )

is this a correct way to go about this? I'm also not sure about proving the other direction

No, the middle inequality is indeed not correct. Try it like this:

[tex]inf(C)\leq st<inf(S)inf(T)+inf(S)e+inf(T)e+e^2[/tex]

Because e is arbitrary, we can let e go to 0, thus

[tex]inf(C)<inf(S)\inf(T)[/tex]

For the other inequality, take [itex]st<inf(C)+e[/itex] and do something with it.
 
faceblah said:
st < (inf S + e)(inf T + e) = (inf S)(inf T) + (inf S)*e + (inf T)*e + e^2

inf C <= st <= (inf S)(inf T) < inf S)(inf T) + (inf S)*e + (inf T)*e + e^2
(NOTE: I'm not sure about the middle inequality: "st <= (inf S)(inf T)" )
You're right to be unsure. You have
  • [itex]\inf C \leq st[/itex]
  • [itex]st < (\inf S)(\inf T) + (\inf S) \epsilon + (\inf T) \epsilon + \epsilon^2[/itex]
So you just put the two together:
[itex]\inf C \leq st< (\inf S)(\inf T) + (\inf S) \epsilon + (\inf T) \epsilon + \epsilon^2[/itex]​
well, what you really care about is just transitivity:
[itex]\inf C < (\inf S)(\inf T) + (\inf S) \epsilon + (\inf T) \epsilon + \epsilon^2[/itex]​
And then invoke what you can about the fact that this is true for every positive real number [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

(aside: micromass forgot that < turns into [itex]\leq[/itex] when doing limits)
 
Hurkyl said:
(aside: micromass forgot that < turns into [itex]\leq[/itex] when doing limits)

Oh my, I'm still not fully awake :frown:
 
For the other direction I'm guessing it's:

There is an st in C such that st < inf C + e.
By definition, inf S <= s for all s and inf T <= t for all t. So (inf S)(inf T) <= st.

So we have (inf C + e) > st => (inf S)(inf T). so (inf C + e) > (inf S)(inf T). (I need this to be a => though)

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "invoking what you know about e". Does this mean that the ">" becomes a "=>". See below for context

Hurkyl said:
well, what you really care about is just transitivity:
[itex]\inf C < (\inf S)(\inf T) + (\inf S) \epsilon + (\inf T) \epsilon + \epsilon^2[/itex]​
And then invoke what you can about the fact that this is true for every positive real number [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

(aside: micromass forgot that < turns into [itex]\leq[/itex] when doing limits)
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K