Proving Inner Product Space: x not in W, y in W(perp)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 2K views
jbear12
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Let V be an inner product space, and let W be a finite-dimensional subspace of V. If x[tex]\notin[/tex] W, prove that there exists y[tex]\in[/tex] V such that y [tex]\in[/tex] W(perp), but <x,y>[tex]\neq[/tex] 0.

I don't have a clue...
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you could start by using something along the lines of gram-schmidt to decompose to x into a sum of vector from W & one from W perp...
 
Umm..I don't really get it. Can you explain more specifically? Thank you.
 
what don't you get?

first you need to assume x is non-zero

x is not contained in W, and as its non-zero, this means it must have a component in W perp , (as V = W + W perp by definition of W perp, sloppy notation here, but hopefully you get the idea)

now consider the dot product of x with the component of x in W perp