Proving Integral of Log(z+5) is 0 Around Contour z=1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the integral of the function Log(z+5) around the contour defined by |z| = 1 is zero. Participants are exploring concepts from complex analysis, particularly the application of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem and the behavior of integrals around singularities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether to use the Cauchy-Goursat theorem or to evaluate the integral directly. There is a focus on identifying singularities and their relation to the contour.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the Cauchy-Goursat theorem, noting that certain points are outside the contour, which suggests that the integral may vanish. Others are questioning the implications of singularities and the orientation of contours in relation to the integral's evaluation.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of upcoming exams and the pressure to understand these concepts, indicating a learning environment where participants are seeking clarity on complex analysis topics.

soulsearching
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this pls?

How can you prove that the integral of f(z) around the contour z= 1 is 0

where f(z) is Log(z+5)

Thx





I know Log(z) is ln r + i (theta). But i don't know how that applies to this situation.

Also, do I solve it as a normal integral or use the Cauchy Goursat theorem to prove that its integral is zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

soulsearching said:
How can you prove that the integral of f(z) around the contour z= 1 is 0

Also, do I solve it as a normal integral or use the Cauchy Goursat theorem to prove that its integral is zero?

Hi soulsearching! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Do you mean |z| = 1?

If so, then z + 5 is just the circle of radius 1 and centre at 5. It doesn't include the origin (z + 5 = 0), so yes … always do it the easy way … use Cauchy Goursat! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi soulsearching! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Do you mean |z| = 1?

If so, then z = 5 is just the circle of radius 1 and centre at 5. It doesn't include the origin (z + 5 = 0), so yes … always do it the easy way … use Cauchy Goursat! :smile:



So the point z = 5 is outside the contour, so the integral vanishes right? Thank you Tim.



When trying to show the same for this equation here around the same contour

f(Z) = (4z^2 -4z +5)^-1

I found the singularities here to be (1/2 + i) and (1/2-i). Is the integral zero because both singularities are outside the circle of radius 1? Thank you.

I have a major exam tmr and my professor is not being of much help, but I really appreciate your help. :-)
 
soulsearching said:
So the point z = 5 is outside the contour, so the integral vanishes right? Thank you Tim.



When trying to show the same for this equation here around the same contour

f(Z) = (4z^2 -4z +5)^-1

I found the singularities here to be (1/2 + i) and (1/2-i). Is the integral zero because both singularities are outside the circle of radius 1? Thank you.

I have a major exam tmr and my professor is not being of much help, but I really appreciate your help. :-)

Yes.

And in this case your integrand is analytic inside and on the circle |z| = 1, so again it's 0 by cauchy's.
 
Thanks Dan.
 
soulsearching said:
When trying to show the same for this equation here around the same contour

f(Z) = (4z^2 -4z +5)^-1

I found the singularities here to be (1/2 + i) and (1/2-i). Is the integral zero because both singularities are outside the circle of radius 1?

Looks good to me! :smile:
 
Also when trying to find the integral of (1/8z^3 -1) around the contour c=1.

I found the singularities to be 1/2, 1/2exp(2pi/3), and 1/2exp(4pi/3)

What is the next step here. Do I just assume the integral is 6pi(i) after using partial fractions to find the numerators of the 3 fractions.

The answer is actually 0, but I don't understand how it was solved. I know it might have something to do with the rule that says, the sum of the integral of a C1, C2 and C3 is equal to the integral of the outside contour, but how do i know the orientation of the three contours inside the big contour C.

Thanks, hope I am not asking too many questions
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K