Proving integration for a bounded increasing function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the integrability of a bounded increasing function f on the interval [a,b] using the definitions of upper and lower sums. The key steps involve defining the partition p into n equal sub-intervals, calculating the lower sum s_p and upper sum S_p, and demonstrating that the difference S_p - s_p can be made arbitrarily small. The conclusion is that if I = J, where I is the supremum of lower sums and J is the infimum of upper sums, then f is integrable on [a,b]. The discussion also touches on the integrability of decreasing functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrals and the concept of integrability
  • Familiarity with partitions of intervals and their significance in calculus
  • Knowledge of upper and lower sums in the context of bounded functions
  • Basic understanding of the properties of increasing and decreasing functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Riemann integral and its properties in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Explore the integrability of decreasing functions and their characteristics
  • Investigate the application of the ε-δ definition in proving integrability
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in real analysis, and anyone seeking to understand the conditions for the integrability of functions on closed intervals.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Suppose that f is a bounded, increasing function on [a,b]. If p is the partition of [a,b] into n equal sub intervals, compute Sp - sp and hence show f is integrable on [a,b]. What can you say about a decreasing function?

Homework Equations



We partition [a,b] into sub-intervals.

For each i, we let : m_i = inf \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\} and M_i = sup \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\}

Now, we define s_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} m_i Δx_i as the lower sum and S_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} M_i Δx_i as the upper sum.

Some more info in my notes :

Let M = sup \left\{{f(x)|x \in [a,b]}\right\} and m = inf \left\{{f(x)|x \in [a,b]}\right\}. Then we get sp ≤ M(b-a) so the set of all possible sp is bounded above.

Let I = sup{sp} and J = inf{Sp}

Definition : if I = J, then f(x) is integrable.

Now another theorem I could use : For a bounded function f on [a,b]. f is integrable if and only if :

\forall ε&gt;0 there is a partition p of [a,b] such that Sp < sp + ε.

The Attempt at a Solution



So we are given that f is a bounded increasing function. This means that m ≤ f ≤ M for some lower bound m and upper bound M. For any partition p of [a,b] into n sub-intervals, we also have :

m_i = inf \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\} and M_i = sup \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\}

Now before I jump any further I want to confirm the direction I'm going in. I have two theorems I provided and I'm wondering which one is more appropriate to use here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I have an idea about how the information given relates, so continuing from my first post :

So we are given that f is a bounded increasing function. This means that m ≤ f ≤ M for some lower bound m and upper bound M. For any partition p of [a,b] into n sub-intervals, we also have :

m_i = inf \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\} and M_i = sup \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\}

Now, writing out the upper sum we get : S_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} M_iΔx_i and the lower sum : s_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} m_iΔx_i

So we get :

S_p - s_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (M_i - m_i)Δx_i = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (f(x_i) - f(x_{i-1}))(\frac{b-a}{n})

I think this the path I'm trying to take.
 
Sorry for all the posting, but since no one has responded I believe I have pieced this puzzle together. So I'll write it out cleanly here.

So we are given that f is a bounded increasing function on [a,b]. This means that f(a) ≤ f(x) ≤ f(b) for any x in [a,b]. Hence f(a) is a lower bound for f and f(b) is an upper bound so that f is bounded. We need to show that for any ε>0, we can choose any partition p of [a,b] into n sub-intervals such that Sp - sp < ε. Suppose p is the partition \left\{{x_0, x_1, ..., x_n}\right\}.

We let : L = \displaystyle\max_{1≤i≤n}(x_i - x_{i-1}) &lt; \frac{ε}{f(b) - f(a)} = Q

Now, we define :

m_i = inf \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\} and M_i = sup \left\{{f(x)|x_{i-1} ≤ x ≤ x_i}\right\}

Now, writing out the upper sum we get : S_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} M_iΔx_i and the lower sum : s_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} m_iΔx_i

So we get :

S_p - s_p = \sum_{i=1}^{n} (M_i - m_i)Δx_i ≤ \sum_{i=1}^{n} (f(x_i) - f(x_{i-1}))L = (f(b) - f(a))L &lt; (f(b) - f(a))Q = ε

Hence f is integrable on [a,b] since Sp - sp < ε.

Is this good? It's my first time trying one of these.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K