Proving \lim_{x \to a} f(x)g(x) = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hobold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if \( \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = 0 \) and \( g(x) \) is a bounded function, then \( \lim_{x \to a} f(x)g(x) = 0 \). Participants clarify that a bounded function \( g \) satisfies \( |g(x)| \leq M \) for some \( M > 0 \). The proof cannot rely on the limit of \( g(x) \) existing at \( x \to a \), as this is not guaranteed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions of boundedness and limits in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of bounded functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Basic mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Learn about bounded functions and their implications in analysis
  • Explore proofs involving products of functions approaching limits
  • Investigate examples of limits involving bounded functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians focusing on real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of functions at limits.

Hobold
Messages
82
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Make [itex]f, g : X \subseteq \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex] function with [itex]g[/itex] being a limited function and [itex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = 0[/itex] for [itex]a \in X[/itex]. Prove that [itex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x)g(x) = 0[/itex].

Homework Equations



A function [itex]g[/itex] is limited if there's a [itex]M>0[/itex] for which [itex]|g(x)| >= M[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems pretty obvious that the affirmation is true, but I can1t find a proof for that. You can't also assume that g has a limit at x -> a because there's nothing saying that, therefore it's not possible to use a direct proof by limits properties.

I've been trying to do this by definition of limits, but I always get that limit of g when x tends to a has to exist, which is not true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you mean that [itex]|g(x)| \leq M[/itex]?

knowing M couldn't you choose x close enough to a, such that f(x) is much smaller than M?
 
Last edited:
Hobold said:
A function [itex]g[/itex] is limited if there's a [itex]M>0[/itex] for which [itex]|g(x)| >= M[/itex]
The usual terminology for such a function, with lanedance's correction, is bounded, not limited.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K