Proving Linear Independence: If v\notin\left\langlev1,...,vk\right\rangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter annoymage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Independent Linear
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the vectors v1, v2, ..., vk, and v are linearly independent, then v does not belong to the span of the vectors v1, v2, ..., vk. Participants explore various proof techniques, including proof by contrapositive and proof by contradiction. The consensus is that while proof by contradiction is effective, there is interest in finding a direct proof method. Clarification is sought on the equivalence of the statements regarding linear independence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with the concept of vector span
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, including proof by contradiction
  • Basic linear algebra concepts and terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Learn about the span of a set of vectors and its implications
  • Explore direct proof techniques in linear algebra
  • Review examples of proof by contradiction in mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians interested in proof techniques, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of vector spaces and linear independence.

annoymage
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If v11,...,vk,v are linear independent, prove that v\notin

\left\langlev1,...,vk\right\rangle


Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



i can prove it by contrapositive, but I'm curious how to proof it with

"If v11,...,vk,v are linear independent" in the beginning,

any idea? T_T
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I really cannot read what you have here.

Are you trying to show that "if \{v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k, v\} is linearly independent, then v is not in the span of \{v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k\}&quot;?<br /> <br /> Since proof by contradiction works nicely, why look for a &quot;direct&quot; proof?
 
i'm just curious, maybe there is a way that i don't know,

anyway, you wrote

"<br /> \{v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k, v\}<br /> is linearly independent"

is it the same thing as "<br /> v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k, v<br /> are linear independent" ??
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K