Proving LS=RS in Trigonometry?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two sides in trigonometric identities, specifically focusing on the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of given equations. Participants are exploring various approaches to demonstrate that LHS equals RHS.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest expanding the expressions to utilize trigonometric identities, while others express concerns about the validity of manipulating both sides simultaneously. There are discussions about maintaining factored forms and using Pythagorean identities to simplify terms. Additionally, some participants question how to handle exponents in the context of identities.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various strategies and considerations. There is a mix of approaches being explored, including factoring and rewriting terms, but no explicit consensus has been reached on a single method. Guidance has been provided regarding the importance of not multiplying out numerators and focusing on factored forms.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention constraints imposed by their educational context, such as rules against manipulating both sides of an equation simultaneously. There are also indications of confusion regarding specific steps in the problem-solving process, particularly related to exponent manipulation.

tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/3413/daumequation13237287425.png

Prove that LS=RS.

Homework Equations



There are no relevant equations.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/3413/daumequation13237287425.png
 

Attachments

  • daum_equation_1323728742571.png
    daum_equation_1323728742571.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 468
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
if LHS=RHS, then:

(\cos x-\sin y)(\cos x+\sin y)=(\cos y+\sin x)(\cos y-\sin x)

... right?
So why not expand it out and look for the usual identities?
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
if LHS=RHS, then:

(\cos x-\sin y)(\cos x+\sin y)=(\cos y+\sin x)(\cos x-\sin y)

... right?
So why not expand it out and look for the usual identities?

According to my teacher/school (I'm from Ontario), you're not allowed to work on both sides like that. You have to work on each side independent from the other. Why? I have no idea why... :(

edit: My teacher says you can't do that, because we don't know if LS=RS. We're trying to see if LS=RS by proving it.
 
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/4701/daumequation13237312394.png

That's another identity I'm having trouble with. I have no idea how to change the exponents from 4 to 2. I'm totally lost with this one. I can't even think of a first step.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Regarding your first post in this thread: do NOT multiply out the numerators. Leave them in factored form. So you have this:
\frac{(\cos x - \sin y)(\cos y + \sin x)}{cos^2 y - sin^2 x}
Now use the Pythagorean identities to rewrite BOTH terms in the denominator.

If you figure this out, you'll probably ask, how did I know NOT to multiply out the numerator? I noticed that when you multiplied top and bottom by (cos y + sin x), that is also the numerator of the RHS. You'll see what happens by leaving the numerator in factored form.
 
tahayassen said:
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/4701/daumequation13237312394.png

That's another identity I'm having trouble with. I have no idea how to change the exponents from 4 to 2. I'm totally lost with this one. I can't even think of a first step.
Note that on the LHS,
sin2 x + cos4 x = sin2 x + (cos2 x)2
Use the Pythagorean identity for what's inside the parentheses and see what happens.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
eumyang said:
Regarding your first post in this thread: do NOT multiply out the numerators. Leave them in factored form. So you have this:
\frac{(\cos x - \sin y)(\cos y + \sin x)}{cos^2 y - sin^2 x}
Now use the Pythagorean identities to rewrite BOTH terms in the denominator.

If you figure this out, you'll probably ask, how did I know NOT to multiply out the numerator? I noticed that when you multiplied top and bottom by (cos y + sin x), that is also the numerator of the RHS. You'll see what happens by leaving the numerator in factored form.

Amazing! I feel so happy solving these. After that, I noticed that the denominator was a difference of square, and I canceled out the factors.
 
eumyang said:
Note that on the LHS,
sin2 x + cos4 x = sin2 x + (cos2 x)2
Use the Pythagorean identity for what's inside the parentheses and see what happens.

Haha. I got this identity too! Thanks!

The interesting part about this one is that when I wrote it down on paper, I couldn't solve it. It wasn't until I was inputting into my equation editor to generate the images did I realize what I missed earlier.
 
If LHS=RHS then I can propose (what I did) - and attempt to disprove it. If the proposition is false, then surely the equation will yield an inconsistency like 2=3? Of course, not all will reduce easily.

You could then start by putting both sides over a common denominator ... then you only have to prove the numerators are the same. This will be mathematically equivalent to the above approach.

On the other one - without looking: you can reduce the power by using the half-angles.

[ah - beat me to it]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K