Mathematica Proving Mathematical Statements: a Real-Life Example

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of two mathematical statements involving quantifiers and their truth values. The first statement, "for all x in R, there exists a y in R such that y^2 = x^2 + 1," is true because for any real number x, a corresponding real number y can be found. The second statement, "there exists a y in R such that for all x in R, y^2 = x^2 + 1," is false since no single y can satisfy the equation for every possible x. The importance of the order of quantifiers is highlighted, demonstrating that they can significantly change the meaning of mathematical statements. A simpler example illustrates this difference: the first statement about equality is true, while the second is false, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of quantifiers in mathematical logic.
Rob Hal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

If I have these two statements given to me, and I have to determine whether they are true or not.

a) \forall x \epsilon R \exists y \epsilon R (y^2 = x^2 + 1)
b) \exists y \epsilon R \forall x \epsilon R (y^2 = x^2 + 1)

Now, to me, they both mean exactly the same thing, and both can be shown to be false by setting x = 2, then y is not a real number.

However, seeing that the question specifically asks to prove just those two statements, I'm wondering if perhaps I am interpreting them wrong and they actually mean two different things.

Thanks in advance for any advice,
Robbie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rob Hal said:
Now, to me, they both mean exactly the same thing, and both can be shown to be false by setting x = 2, then y is not a real number.
If x = 2 then y^2 = 2^2 + 1 \Leftrightarrow y = \pm \sqrt 5. Those are real numbers, no?
 
lol... yeah...
I was thinking I was looking for rationals only... whoops...

Still, is there any difference in the two statements themselves?
 
Try a simpler one to see how the order of the quantifiers makes a difference:

\forall x \in \mathbb{R} \ \exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ (x = y)

This says that for every real x that I choose, I can find at least one real y that is equal to that x. This is obviously true, since x = x.

\exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ \forall x \in \mathbb{R} \ (x = y)

This says that I can find at least one real y that is equal to every real x. Well, there's more than one real number, so this is false.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top