Proving Matrix Transformation Property

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of matrix transformations involving the transpose operation and scalar multiplication. The original poster presents a statement that involves two matrices, A and B, and real numbers λ and μ, seeking to demonstrate the equality of the transposed expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express uncertainty about how to incorporate the scalars λ and μ into their reasoning. Some suggest that if the scalars were not present, the problem would be more straightforward. Others propose examining the elements of the matrices directly to establish equality.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided supportive feedback, encouraging the original poster and expressing confidence in their ability to tackle the problem. There is an indication that various approaches are being considered, including the use of matrix elements and properties of transposition.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge posed by the presence of scalars in the problem, questioning how these affect the proof. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the distribution of scalars across matrix elements.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement



Let A and B be n x m matrices, and λ and μ be real numbers. Prove that:
[itex](λA+μB)^T = λA^T+μB^t[/itex]

Homework Equations


:/

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm struggling to start here.

If there was no λ and μ, I think I'd be able to reasonably solve this. How do I show that these real numbers don't matter in this exchange?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:

Homework Statement



Let A and B be n x m matrices, and λ and μ be real numbers. Prove that:
[itex](λA+μB)^T = λA^T+μB^t[/itex]

Homework Equations


:/

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm struggling to start here.

If there was no λ and μ, I think I'd be able to reasonably solve this. How do I show that these real numbers don't matter in this exchange?

Let ##A = (a_{ij})## and ##B=(b_{ij})## and show that the corresponding elements on the two sides are equal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
RJLiberator said:
If there was no λ and μ, I think I'd be able to reasonably solve this. How do I show that these real numbers don't matter in this exchange?

There is really no difference between showing it with a scalar multiple and without the scalar multiple, since the scalars distribute to every term in the matrix. You could just as easily let ##A_\lambda = \lambda A## and ##B_\mu = \mu B## and show what you say you could show for the new matrices. Then the last step is to show that you can pull the scalars back out...since they are distributed to each term, they will not affect the solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Lc and Ruber, thanks for the words of advice. What you stated resonates well with me. I will be working on this problem in the next 24 hours and I feel confident about it. I will post back with my update. :)
 
Got it.
Using the transpose definition I make the original statement
(λA+μB)_ji
and then by previous axioms/operations it flows smoothly to λ(A_ji)+μ(B_ji)

A use of the transpose definition again
(λA^T+μB^T)

And we have shown what was needed to be shown.
:) Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K