Proving n2 < 2n using Mathematical Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter skeough15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality n² < 2n using mathematical induction. The original poster attempts to establish this for values of n starting from 5, having verified it for lower values but encountering difficulties in the inductive step.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the base case and the inductive step, with some suggesting the need for a different approach or additional induction. There is also a mention of needing to show a related inequality involving powers of 2.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations and approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the proof, but no consensus has been reached on the correct method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific values for which the inequality holds or does not hold, and the original poster's choice to start the induction at n=5 raises questions about the assumptions made regarding lower values.

skeough15
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are asked to try and prove the values n where n2 < 2(n) .
It asks us to prove it by Math Induction.

The Attempt at a Solution


I can see it works for n=0 and n=1 but not for n=2,3,4 . So I made my base step n=5 and showed that 52 = 25 < 25 =32 as 25<32. I then started simple mathematical induction off by assuming that n2<2n for n>5, and tried to prove it using (n+1)2<2(n+1) but can't seem to get that proven. Any suggested help on how to prove that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


It seems that you need to show that 2n+1&lt;2^n... Maybe another induction?
 


yes that is exactly what I had to do, I assume it is sufficient to have an induction proof within an induction proof?
 


I can't really see a problem with that...
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K