Proving Newton's third law invariant with Galilean tranfrom

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the invariance of Newton's third law under Galilean transformations. The equations of motion for two particles, represented as m1(d²r1/dt²) = F12 and m2(d²r2/dt²) = F21, are analyzed using the Galilean transformation equations: t' = t, m' = m, and r' = r - vt. The participant successfully demonstrates that the force equations remain consistent under the transformation, confirming that F12(r1, r2, u1, u2) = F12'(r1 - vt, r2 - vt, u1 - v, u2 - v). This establishes the form invariance of Newtonian mechanics in the context of Galilean relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Galilean transformations
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Concept of force as mass times acceleration (F = ma)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Galilean invariance in classical mechanics
  • Explore advanced topics in differential equations related to motion
  • Learn about the historical context and significance of Newton's laws
  • Investigate the relationship between Galilean transformations and Lorentz transformations in special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics and the foundational principles of motion and force.

AllRelative
Messages
42
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider Newton’s force law for two particles interact through a central force F12(r1',r2',u1,u2), where by Newton’s third law F12 = -F21.

m1(d^2r1/dt^2) = F12(r1,r2,u1,u2)

m2(d^2r2/dt^2) = F21(r1,r2,u1,u2)
A. Show that Newtonian mechanics is form invariant with respect to a Galilean transformation?

Homework Equations


Newton's third law:
F12 = -F21

Galilean Transform:
t'=t
m'=m
r'=r-vt

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the concept of invariance. I understand Galilean relativity quite well. I just have no clue where to start the proof. I haven't done much proofs in my past physics and math courses.

I tried writing the two F=m*a equations with the primed coordinates but after that I'm lost. here is what I wrote:

m1(d^2(r1-v*t)/dt^2) = (F12)'((r1-v*t),(r2-v*t),(u1-v),(u2-v)

m2(d^2(r2-v*t)/dt^2) = -(F21)'((r1-v*t),(r2-v*t),(u1-v),(u2-v)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your left hand side has a second order differential equation of a sum. You can use the sum rule and work that out
 
Thanks for the quick reply! Doing that brings me to:

m1(d^2(r1)/dt^2) - m1(d^2(v*t)/dt^2) =

m1*a1 - 0 = (F12)'((r1-v*t),(r2-v*t),(u1-v),(u2-v)

And therefore I can say that F12(r1,r2,u1,u2) = (F12)'((r1-v*t),(r2-v*t),(u1-v),(u2-v)

Is that right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K