"Proving Nilpotent Element in R has Unique Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter rookandpawn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that a ring R has no nonzero nilpotent elements if and only if 0 is the unique solution to the equation x^2 = 0. The initial proof shows that if R lacks nonzero nilpotent elements, then the only solution to x^2 = 0 must be 0. A contradiction is presented by assuming the existence of a nonzero nilpotent element, leading to the conclusion that either case (even or odd n) results in a contradiction regarding the uniqueness of the solution. The participants emphasize the importance of clearly stating that n is the least positive integer for which a^n = 0 to strengthen the argument. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in mathematical proofs and confidence in presenting logical reasoning.
rookandpawn
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An element a of a ring is nilpotent if a^n = 0 for some positive integer n.
Prove that R has no nonzero nilpotent elements if and only if 0 is the unique
solution of the equation x^2 = 0

Homework Equations



I think nilpotent means that not only that a^n = 0 for some positive integer
n but that n is the least positive integer such that a^n = 0. ?


The Attempt at a Solution



Proving ->
if R has no nonzero nilpotent elements then there is no nonzero element a such that a^n = 0, and specifically in the case of n = 2, there is no such a.
Hence 0 is the unique solution of x^2 = 0


Proving <-(via contradiction)
if 0 is the unique solution of x^2 = 0 then
if R does have some nonzero nilpotent element a, then a^n = 0 for
some positive inetger n.

then either
n is even where a^n = a^(n/2) * a^(n/2) = 0
but since 0 is the unique solution of x^2 = 0, then
a^(n/2) = 0. Which contradicts the fact that n is the least
positive integer for which a^n = 0.

Or n is odd, where
a^n = 0 ---> (a^n)*(a) = 0 * (a) (multiplying both sides by a)
---> a^(n+1) = 0, now n+1 is an even integer,
which can then be factored into a square
so a^(n+1/2) * a^(n+1/2) = 0, but since 0 is the unique
solution of x^2 = 0, then a^(n+1/2) = 0, which contradicts the
fact that n is the least positive integer for which a^n = 0.

I would very much appreciate any evaluation of my attempt. Especially because I feel unsure of the n is odd case, since I just multiplied both sides by a so i could get the square.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What could be wrong with that? I think you are just lacking confidence. You may want to say explicitly that a^n=0 and a^m!=0 for m<n. As you say, make sure n is the least nilpotent power of a.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
893
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K