Proving No Intersection: y=2x-1 & y=x^4+3x^2+2x

  • Thread starter Thread starter msimard8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intersection
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the line described by the equation y=2x-1 does not intersect the curve defined by y=x^4 + 3x^2 + 2x. Participants are exploring indirect proof techniques to establish this claim.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting the equations equal to each other and consider substitutions to simplify the problem. There is mention of deriving a contradiction based on the properties of the resulting polynomial.

Discussion Status

Some participants are actively engaging with the problem, suggesting substitutions and discussing the implications of their findings. There is recognition of errors in reasoning and calculations, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of using indirect proof and are addressing potential errors in their calculations and assumptions about the roots of the equations.

msimard8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Heres the quesion

Prove that the line whose equation is y=2x-1 does not intersect the curve with equation y=x^4 + 3x^2 +2x.

We are suppose to solve this using indirect proof, thus assuming the equations do intersect, and proving that wrong.

i let the y's equal each other, but that isn't getting me anywhere

where should i start.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
msimard8 said:
Heres the quesion

Prove that the line whose equation is y=2x-1 does not intersect the curve with equation y=x^4 + 3x^2 +2x.

We are suppose to solve this using indirect proof, thus assuming the equations do intersect, and proving that wrong.

i let the y's equal each other, but that isn't getting me anywhere

where should i start.

thanks

Of course that is getting you somewhere. Ever thought of substituting x^2 = t ?
 
Let [itex]y_1(x) = 2x-1[/itex] and [itex]y_2(x) = x^4 + 3x^2 + 2x[/itex]. Look at [itex]f(x) = y_2(x) - y_1(x) = x^4 + 3x^2 + 1[/itex].

If [itex]y_1[/itex] and [itex]y_2[/itex] intersect at [itex]x_0 \in \mathbb{R}[/itex] then [itex]f(x_0) = 0[/itex]. Can you get the contradiction (what do you know about [itex]x^2, \, x^4[/itex] when [itex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/itex]?)?
 
radou said:
Of course that is getting you somewhere. Ever thought of substituting x^2 = t ?


umm yea i got the roots, x=1 or x=1 or x=-1

but what does that mean
 
msimard8 said:
umm yea i got the roots, x=1 or x=1 or x=-1

but what does that mean

How did you get these roots? Let's start again. Intersection means setting x^4+3x^2+2x = 2x - 1, which implies x^4+3x^2+1=0. Now, as said, substitute x^2 = t, and solve the quadratic equation. Both solutions of this equation t1 and t2 are negative. So, substituting back to x^2 = t means that there is no real solution for the equation x^4+3x^2+1=0, i.e. y1 = x^4+3x^2+2x and y2 = 2x - 1 don't intersect.
 
thank you so much


i just made a simple sign error in factoring t^2 + t +1

which gave me wrong roots

thanks again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K