Proving Orthogonality of Legendre Polynomials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials through the integral equation involving the polynomials \( P_n(x) \) and \( P_m(x) \). The integral is expressed as \( \int_{-1}^{1} x P_n(x) P_m(x) dx = \frac{2(n+1)}{(2n+1)(2n+3)}\delta_{m,n+1} + \frac{2n}{(2n+1)(2n-1)}\delta_{m,n-1} \). Participants suggest using recursion relationships and the Rodriguez formula to simplify the integration process. The discussion confirms that the problem can be solved effectively by applying these mathematical tools.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Legendre polynomials
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
  • Knowledge of recursion relationships in polynomial functions
  • Basic grasp of delta functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the recursion relationships of Legendre polynomials in detail
  • Learn about the Rodriguez formula for generating Legendre polynomials
  • Practice integration by parts with polynomial functions
  • Explore the properties and applications of delta functions in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in the properties of orthogonal polynomials and their applications in solving differential equations.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Show that

\int_{-1}^{1} x P_n(x) P_m(x) dx = \frac{2(n+1)}{(2n+1)(2n+3)}\delta_{m,n+1} + \frac{2n}{(2n+1)(2n-1)}\delta_{m,n-1}

I guess I should use orthogonality with the Legendre polynomials, but if I integrate by parts to get rid of the x my integral equals zero.
Any tip on how to start working with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First thought would be to use one of the recursion relationships on xPn(x).

For example -

(l+1)P_{l+1}(x)\,-\,(2l+1)xP_l(x)\,+\,lP_{l-1}(x)\,=\,0

BTW, has one shown -

\int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x) P_m(x) dx = \frac{2}{2n+1}\delta_{m,n}

That was demonstrated here on PF recently.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I've got the last equation and I'll try with the recursion, thank you. =)
 
Another thing I would recommend is to try using the Rodriguez formula for the Legendre polynomials, then play games with integration by parts.
 
And why is that? I solved the problem by the way. Pretty simple when you know about the recursion relationships.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
897
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K