Proving Orthogonality of Legendre Polynomials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials through a specific integral involving the polynomials and the variable x. The context is rooted in mathematical analysis and orthogonal functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using orthogonality properties and recursion relationships of Legendre polynomials. There are attempts to integrate by parts and suggestions to utilize the Rodriguez formula. Questions arise regarding the initial setup and the implications of integrating by parts.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches being explored, such as recursion relationships and integration techniques. Some participants express confidence in their understanding, while others seek clarification on the methods to apply.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference previously established results regarding the orthogonality of Legendre polynomials, indicating a shared knowledge base. There is mention of specific integral properties that may influence the current problem.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Show that

[tex]\int_{-1}^{1} x P_n(x) P_m(x) dx = \frac{2(n+1)}{(2n+1)(2n+3)}\delta_{m,n+1} + \frac{2n}{(2n+1)(2n-1)}\delta_{m,n-1}[/tex]

I guess I should use orthogonality with the Legendre polynomials, but if I integrate by parts to get rid of the x my integral equals zero.
Any tip on how to start working with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First thought would be to use one of the recursion relationships on xPn(x).

For example -

[tex](l+1)P_{l+1}(x)\,-\,(2l+1)xP_l(x)\,+\,lP_{l-1}(x)\,=\,0[/tex]

BTW, has one shown -

[tex]\int_{-1}^{1} P_n(x) P_m(x) dx = \frac{2}{2n+1}\delta_{m,n}[/tex]

That was demonstrated here on PF recently.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I've got the last equation and I'll try with the recursion, thank you. =)
 
Another thing I would recommend is to try using the Rodriguez formula for the Legendre polynomials, then play games with integration by parts.
 
And why is that? I solved the problem by the way. Pretty simple when you know about the recursion relationships.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K