Proving properties of lim sup. Good attempt at proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamintl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Properties
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 3K views
tamintl
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
[/itex]

Homework Statement


Is the following statement true or false: 'if (cn) and (dn) are bounded sequences of positive real numbers then:

lim sup (cndn) = (lim sup cn)(lim sup dn)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


for all n in the positive reals. cn and dn are bounded.

Since cn and dn are bounded we know they converge.

Hence, by the theorem lim(cndn)=lim cnlim dn we can say that lim(cn)=lim sup (cn) and lim(dn)=lim sup (dn)

Hence, lim sup (cndn) = (lim sup cn)(lim sup dn)

HENCE, TRUE!

******I am not sure about line 2 where I say bounded => converge. I know that you can say that converge means bounded but I don't know if I can do the reverse.*******
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tamintl said:
******I am not sure about line 2 where I say bounded => converge. I know that you can say that converge means bounded but I don't know if I can do the reverse.*******

You can't. You can say that a bounded monotone sequence converges and that a bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence. But a bounded sequence need not converge. You should be able to come up with a pretty simple example of a bounded sequence that does not converge (at least now that you know there is one). In the process of doing so, you may stumble across the answer to your problem.