Proving Rolle's Theorem - Finding 2 Real Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Rolle's theorem is applied to the function g(x) = 3x^4 + 4x^3 + 6x^2 - 3 to demonstrate that it has exactly two real roots. The derivative g'(x) = 12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x reveals that the only stationary point is at x = 0. By analyzing the behavior of g'(x) around this point, it is established that the function is decreasing for x < 0 and increasing for x > 0, confirming that g(x) can cross the x-axis at most twice. Thus, the application of Rolle's theorem indicates that g(x) has exactly two real roots.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rolle's Theorem and its conditions
  • Ability to compute derivatives of polynomial functions
  • Familiarity with the quadratic formula and its implications
  • Knowledge of function behavior analysis (increasing/decreasing functions)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of higher-order versions of Rolle's Theorem
  • Learn about the Intermediate Value Theorem and its relationship with real roots
  • Explore polynomial root-finding techniques, including Descartes' Rule of Signs
  • Investigate the graphical representation of polynomial functions to visualize roots
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in calculus, particularly those studying polynomial functions and their properties.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
Use Rolle's theorem to show that g(x) = 3x^4 +4x^3 +6x^2 -3 has exactly two real roots.



3. The Attempt at a Solution :

Rolle's theorem states that if g is continious on the closed interval [a,b] and differentiable on the open interval (a,b). Assuming that g(a) = g(b). Then g'(x0) = 0 for at least one point x0 in (a,b).

Looking at the derivative of that function:
g&#039;(x) = 12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x

the function is equal to zero when;
12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x = 0
x (x^2 + x + 1) = 0

I used the quadratic formula and I believe x^2 + x + 1 has no real roots which means x = 0 is the only real root for the derivative function. Thus x = 0 is the only "stationary point" on the curve for the original function g(x).

I only found one stationary point! How does this show that "there can be at most 2 real roots"?

How can I use Rolle's theorem to prove that g has at most two real roots?

(I believe at x = 0 the function is negative and it perhaps crosses the x-axis but I don't know how to find the coordinates of the roots!)


 
Physics news on Phys.org
higher-order version?

roam said:
Use Rolle's theorem to show that g(x) = 3x^4 +4x^3 +6x^2 -3 has exactly two real roots.


Hi roam! :smile:

:confused: the only thing I can think of is that perhaps they mean the higher-order version of Rolle's theorem …

If g(a) = g(b) = g(c) with a < b < c, then there must be an x with a < x < c and g''(x) = 0.
 
roam said:
Use Rolle's theorem to show that g(x) = 3x^4 +4x^3 +6x^2 -3 has exactly two real roots.



3. The Attempt at a Solution :

Rolle's theorem states that if g is continious on the closed interval [a,b] and differentiable on the open interval (a,b). Assuming that g(a) = g(b). Then g'(x0) = 0 for at least one point x0 in (a,b).

Looking at the derivative of that function:
g&#039;(x) = 12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x

the function is equal to zero when;
12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x = 0
x (x^2 + x + 1) = 0

I used the quadratic formula and I believe x^2 + x + 1 has no real roots which means x = 0 is the only real root for the derivative function. Thus x = 0 is the only "stationary point" on the curve for the original function g(x).

I only found one stationary point! How does this show that "there can be at most 2 real roots"?

How can I use Rolle's theorem to prove that g has at most two real roots?

(I believe at x = 0 the function is negative and it perhaps crosses the x-axis but I don't know how to find the coordinates of the roots!)


I don't know if you have really "used" Rolles theorem but it is true that y'= 0 only at x= 0. Now, look at x= 1. y'(1)= 1(12+ 1+ 1)= 3> 0. Since y'= 0 only at 0 (and y' is continuous) that tells that y'> 0 and y is increasing for all x> 0. Look at x= -1. y'(-1)= (-1)((-1)2+ (-1)+ 1)= (-1)(1)= -1< 0. That tells you that y'< 0 and y is decreasing for all x< 0. That should be enough to tell you that y cannot have more than rwo zeros.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K