Proving some Dirac-Delta identity that uses Laplacian

  • Thread starter Thread starter davidbenari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Laplacian
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a Dirac-Delta identity involving the Laplacian operator applied to a product of delta functions in three dimensions. The original poster presents an expression they derived and seeks assistance in simplifying it to match a specific form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the Laplacian operator on the delta functions and question the validity of certain terms in the original expression. There is a focus on simplifying the expression and understanding the contributions of specific terms.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints and suggestions for simplifying the expression, particularly by focusing on specific components of the Laplacian. There is an acknowledgment of confusion regarding the terms involved, but progress is being made towards clarity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the properties of the delta function, particularly in relation to its behavior when multiplied by variables, and how these properties affect the outcome of the Laplacian operation.

davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Prove that ##(x^2+y^2+z^2)\nabla^2[\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)]=6\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)##

Homework Equations


##\delta''(x)/2=\delta(x)/x^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I have obtained this:

##6\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z) + (xy)^2/2\Bigg(\delta''(y)\delta''(z)+\delta''(x)\delta''(z)\Bigg)+(xz)^2/2\Bigg(\delta''(y)\delta''(z)+\delta''(x)\delta''(y)\Bigg)+(yz)^2/2\Bigg(\delta''(x)\delta''(z)+\delta''(x)\delta''(y)\Bigg)##

This looks like a huge mess, hehe, sorry.

Any ideas on how to make disappear those ugly terms and only remain with the first one?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whats the identity for [itex]x\delta(x)[/itex]?
 
##x\delta(x)=0## Is this a hint or were you asking me this?
 
yes, it was meant as a hint, your original expression seems a mess indeed, just do only the term [itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}[/itex] of the laplacian and you see easily that it contributes [itex]2\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)[/itex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidbenari
Oh! What a dope am I. Thanks hehe!
 
Wait, sorry. But those terms are divided by (e.g. the x term) ##x^2## So I would get in total that ##(x^2+y^2+z^2)\nabla^2 (\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z))=2\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)(x^-2+y^-2+z^-2)(x^2+y^2+z^2)##
 
yes, expand it, one term of the expansion will be (for x^-2) [itex]2\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)(1+\frac{y^2+z^2}{x^2})[/itex]. Now you can see that for example that [itex]\frac{y^2}{x^2}2\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)[/itex] is zero .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidbenari
Thanks Delta^2 I think I've got it now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K