Proving square root of 2 is irrational with well ordering principle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the square root of 2 is irrational using the well ordering principle. The well ordering principle asserts that every non-empty subset of natural numbers has a least element. The proof begins by assuming that √2 can be expressed as a fraction a/b, leading to a contradiction when smaller representations of √2 are derived, indicating that no smallest element exists. This contradiction demonstrates that √2 cannot be a rational number, thus proving its irrationality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the well ordering principle in mathematics.
  • Knowledge of rational and irrational numbers.
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic manipulation and proofs.
  • Concept of subsets and their properties in set theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the well ordering principle in detail, particularly its implications for rational numbers.
  • Explore proofs of irrationality for other numbers, such as √3 and √5.
  • Learn about the properties of rational and irrational numbers in number theory.
  • Investigate the relationship between algebra and set theory in mathematical proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory and mathematical proofs, particularly those focusing on irrational numbers and the well ordering principle.

symaticc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I know how to prove that square root of 2 is irrational using the well ordering principle but what I'm wondering is, how can we use the well ordering principle to prove this when the square root of two isn't even a subset of the natural numbers? Doesn't the well ordering principle only hold for natural numbers and not rational numbers? If we prove that the well ordering principle does not hold for the square root of 2, aren't we just proving that the square root of 2 is not a natural number?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you include the proof here?? Where exactly did you use well-ordering of rational numbers??
 
Okay so what I did was first, assume that square root of 2 is rational. let √2 = a/b
2 = a^2/b^2
2b^2 = a^2
a^2 is even therefore a is even so it can be written as 2n...
2b^2 = (2n)^2
2b^b = 4n^2
b^2 = 2n^2
2 = b^2 / n^2
√2 = b/n
Since we started with √2 = a/b and then got √2 = b/n where b/n < a/b, if we repeat the step above and keep repeating it, we will always get smaller representations of √2 which means that there is no smallest element and there for √2 is irrational by the well ordering principle which states that every non-empty subset of N has a least element.

Im wondering, if the well ordering principle is only for subsets of N and it doesn't hold for √2, doesn't that just mean that √2 is not a natural number? How does that prove that √2 is irrational?
 
By definition, a set S is well ordered if every non-empty subset of S contains a least element. The set of positive rational numbers is not well-ordered because, for example,

\{\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{4}, \dots \}

has no least element.

I take it that you've been asked to prove that \sqrt{2} is irrational by using the well ordering property of the positive integers. Here's a hint to get you started. Assume that \sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b} where a and b are positive integers. Thus, b\sqrt{2} = a is a positive integer. This implies that the set S, defined by

S = \{n \in \mathbb{N} : n\sqrt{2} \in \mathbb{N}\}

is non-empty. What does the well ordering principle tell you about S?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
38K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K