Proving Sum of Symmetric & Skew-Symmetric Matrix

Click For Summary
Any square matrix can be expressed as the sum of a symmetric matrix and a skew-symmetric matrix, represented as A = B + C, where B is symmetric (B = B^T) and C is skew-symmetric (C = -C^T). The proof involves taking the transpose of A, leading to the equations B + C = A and B - C = A^T, which can be solved to find B and C. The symmetric part is calculated as B = 0.5(A + A^T) and the skew-symmetric part as C = 0.5(A - A^T). This decomposition highlights the relationship between matrix properties and degrees of freedom, similar to the concepts of even and odd functions in mathematics. Understanding this proof is essential for grasping the structure of matrices in linear algebra.
thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that any square matrix can be written as the sum of a symmetric and a skew-symmetric matrix


Homework Equations



For symmetric A=A^{T}
For scew-symmetric A=-A^{T}

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure where to begin. Using algebra didn't work. Got powers and nothing cancelled.

p.s is there an inbuilt template for matrix in latex?

Thanks
Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org


thomas49th said:
Not sure where to begin.
Have you tried some explicit examples?

Using algebra didn't work. Got powers and nothing cancelled.
Could you explain what you wanted to try with algebra? And demonstrate what you actually tried?
 


well i set up the matrix
A =
a b
c d

and
A^{T} = \frac{a c}{b d}


and i multiplied the two together, but that doesn't get you anywhere?

I've been reading through a book, and the last question presented in that topic. I have the answer on the following page

A= 0.5(A+A^T) + 0.5(A-A^T)

but I'm not sure how they come to that answer. I mean I can see that the transforms cancel each other out, but how did they get there?

Thanks :)
 


If f(x) is any function at all, then g(x)= f(x)+ f(-x) is an "even" function, because g(-x)= (-x)= f(-x)= f(-(-x))= f(x)+ f(-x)= fe(x), and h(x)= f(x)- f(-x) is an odd function, because h(-x)= f(-x)-f(-(-x))= -(f(x)- f(-x)). Adding those two functions, g(x)+ h(x)= 2f(x) so g(x)/2= (f(x)+ f(-x))/2 and h(x)/2= (f(x)-f(-x))/2 are even and odd functions that sum to f- they are the "even" and "odd" parts of f. Do you see the similarity with your problem?
 


How many free parameters are there in a M times M matrix? How many are there if the matrix is symmetric or antisymmetric?
 


thomas49th said:
I've been reading through a book, and the last question presented in that topic. I have the answer on the following page

A= 0.5(A+A^T) + 0.5(A-A^T)

but I'm not sure how they come to that answer. I mean I can see that the transforms cancel each other out, but how did they get there?
Denote B and C to represent the symmetric and skew-symmetric parts of the given matrix A: A=B+C

Taking the transpose of A, AT=BT+CT. Now using the fact that B is symmetric and C is skew-symmetric, AT=B-C. The problem here is to solve for B and C. Writing the equations for A and AT as

\aligned<br /> B+C&amp;=A \\<br /> B-C&amp;=A^T<br /> \endaligned

So, two linear equations in two unknowns, and a particularly easy one to solve at that.

\aligned<br /> B&amp;=(A+A^T)/2 \\<br /> C&amp;=(A-A^T)/2<br /> \endaligned
 


Ahh I think I see DH!
If we add B and C, we get A!
A^{T} = B^{T}+C^{T}

As we have square matrices we can say B^{T} = B and C^{T} = -C
this means
A^{T} = B-C
solving that with
A = B + C

gives us your bottom 2 equations (the symmetric and skew-symmetric matrices), which we add up to give a matrice.


Hallofivy, I can see what your kinda getting at!

clamtrox I don't see what you mean by parameters. A matrix holds elements, are these the parameters? Can you expand?

Thanks
Tom
 


Yes yes, I was just thinking about a more high-flying explanation. It obviously works like DH explained.

But yeah, a physicist looks immediately how many degrees of freedom there are. Since a M times M matrix contains M^2 independent functions (independent elements, parameters, degrees of freedom, DOF's), then one would expect that a symmetric M times M and an antisymmetric M times M matrix would have the same number of DOF's combined.
 


HallsofIvy said:
If f(x) is any function at all, then g(x)= f(x)+ f(-x) is an "even" function, because g(-x)= (-x)= f(-x)= f(-(-x))= f(x)+ f(-x)= fe(x), and h(x)= f(x)- f(-x) is an odd function, because h(-x)= f(-x)-f(-(-x))= -(f(x)- f(-x)). Adding those two functions, g(x)+ h(x)= 2f(x) so g(x)/2= (f(x)+ f(-x))/2 and h(x)/2= (f(x)-f(-x))/2 are even and odd functions that sum to f- they are the "even" and "odd" parts of f. Do you see the similarity with your problem?

I was just looking back over this and I was wondering if you could expand on it

I know that an even function is that which f(x) = f(-x) - like a quadratic
An odd function is f(-x) = -f(x) - like x³

When hitting this line, my brain turns to mush:
g(-x)= (-x)= f(-x)= f(-(-x))= f(x)+ f(-x)= fe(x)

so a negative value x is inputted into function g. G is defined as f(x) + f(-x). If f(x) is odd then f(x) + f(-x) = 0, but I'm not sure what
g(-x)= (-x)= f(-x)= f(-(-x))= f(x)+ f(-x)= fe(x)
is telling me. I don't even know what the e does. Can you say a function in number e.

Never really taught such maths in that kind of "comprehensive" manner. I'm a sucker for pretty pictures ;)

Thanks
Tom
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K