Proving Symmetry and Definiteness of Bilinear Form q in Real Vector Space V

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forms
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving properties of a bilinear form \( q \) defined in a real vector space \( V \), specifically its symmetry and positive definiteness. The bilinear form \( q(a,b) = f(a, J(b)) \) is derived from an antisymmetric bilinear form \( f \) and an operator \( J \) satisfying \( J^2 = -I \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the symmetry of \( q \) by comparing \( q(a,b) \) and \( q(b,a) \). They also discuss the implications of the non-degeneracy of \( f \) and its relationship to finding vectors that satisfy certain conditions. Questions arise about the role of the operator \( J \) and the properties of the bilinear form \( f \).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the definitions and properties involved. Some suggest looking into specific cases or examples, while others express uncertainty about how to proceed with the proof. There is a recognition of the importance of the non-degeneracy of \( f \) in the context of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to prove that \( q \) is symmetric and positive definite, with participants noting the significance of the matrix representation of \( f \) and the implications of \( J \) being a symplectic form matrix. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the next steps to take in the proof.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
let f:VxV->R be an antisymmetric billinear form in real vector space V, there exists an operator that satisfies J:V->V J^2=-I.
i need to prove that the form q:VxV->R, for every a,b in V q(a,b)=f(a,J(b)) is symmetric and definite positive.
i tried to show that it's symmetric with its definition and that J^2=-I, but with no success, any hints here how to approach this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a and b are two vectors, you know, from the formula what q(a,b) are. What is q(b,a), also using the formula. For the positive definite part, you will need to look at q(v,v) for v any vector.
 
Aren't you omitting something key about f?
 
yes, but i don't how to say it english.
i know that it's equivalent to that the matrix of f is invertible, i.e has an inverse.
does this help to resolve the question?
 
halls it doesn't help, i tried it this way but got stuck.
 
Google for symplectic forms - that's what this is. The point about f is that you can pick an element, v, and using f and its non-degeneracy, find a w so that f(v,w)=-1...
 
yes, f is non degenrate.
but i don't see how does it help, i need to show that q(a,b)=q(b,a)
wait, a minute if f is antisymmetric then it means that f(x,y)=-f(y,x) then f(a,a)=0 always, but i don't see how can i find a w such that f(v,w)=-1, i mean if J^2=-I then if we write w=J(v), then J^2(v)=J(w)=-v
then f(-J(w),J(v))=f(v,J(v))=-f(J(v),v)=f(J(v),J(w))
f(J(v-w),J(v+w))=0, but how procceed from here?
 
loop quantum gravity said:
i don't see how can i find a w such that f(v,w)=-1

it's a non-degenerate bilinear form, the very definition means that you can find such a w given a non-zero v. That is almost precisely what non-degenerate means.

Ah, wait - I misread your question - I thought you had to prove that J existed. The point is that that J is not any old J, is it? It is a very particular J, and is gotten by taking the decomposition of V using the symplectic form.
 
Last edited:
yes ofcourse that J is the symplectic form matrix, (and to be quite frank with you, i had to prove it before the question iv'e given here, which i ofcourse did).
i know that to be non degenerates means that for every v different than zero, there exists w in V such that f(v,w) is different than zero, anyway i can choose w to be w=(1,0,0,...,0) and v=(0,1,0,..,0) then f(v,w)=-1, but how does this helps me to prove that q is symmetric and definite positive?
 
  • #10
If all else fails, just use the natural symplectic basis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K