Proving that $P(P(x))=x$ Has No Real Solution

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the problem of proving that if a polynomial $P(X)$ with real coefficients has no real solution for the equation $P(X)=x$, then the equation $P(P(x))=x$ also has no real solution. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and challenges related to the properties of polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if $P(X)$ has no real solution for $P(X)=x$, then $P(P(x))=x$ must also lack real solutions.
  • Other participants express confusion regarding the notation used, questioning whether $X$ and $x$ are intended to represent the same variable or if they are distinct.
  • A participant acknowledges a typo in their original statement, clarifying that they meant $P(x) = x$ instead of $P(X) = x$.
  • Another participant indicates that their argument relies on the distinction between $x$ and $X$, suggesting that if they are the same, their reasoning may not hold.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the validity of the initial claim regarding the polynomial $P(P(x))=x$. Multiple viewpoints exist, particularly concerning the notation and its implications for the argument.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in the argument due to the ambiguity in variable notation, which may affect the validity of the reasoning presented.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $P(X)$ be a polynomial with real coefficients for which the equation $P(X)=x$ has no real solution.

Prove that the equation $P(P(x))=x$ has no real solution either.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the polynomial $f(x) = P(x) - x$. If it has no real roots, then clearly either $f(x) > 0$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$, or $f(x) < 0$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$, since if it assumes both positive and negative values then it must assume the value zero at some point, being continuous. As a consequence, if $P(x) = x$ has no real solutions, then either $P(x) > x$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ or $P(x) < x$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$.

Assume that $P(x) > x$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$, then for any $x \in \mathbb{R}$ it follows that $P(P(x)) > P(x) > x$ since $P(x) \in \mathbb{R}$, hence $P(P(x)) \ne x$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ so $P(P(x)) = x$ has no real solutions either. The case for $P(x) < x$ is proved similarly.
 
anemone said:
Let $P(X)$ be a polynomial with real coefficients for which the equation $P(X)=x$ has no real solution.

Prove that the equation $P(P(x))=x$ has no real solution either.

There is no real X for which

$P(X) = x$

for $P(P(x)) = x$ , P(x) cannot be real so complex

$P(x)$ with real coefficient cannot be complex with real $x$

so $P(P(x)) =x $ does not have real solution
 
Thanks to Bacterius and kaliprasad for the solution and participating in this challenge of mine.

Here is another solution:

Let $Q(x)=P(x)-x$. Then $Q(x)$ is a polynomial that never vanishes. We argue that it must always have the same sign.

Supose if possible that $Q(a)<0<Q(b)$ for some reals $a$ and $b$. Since $Q(x)$ being a polynomial is continuous, the Intermediate Value Theorem applies and there must be a number $c$ between $a$ and $b$ for which $Q(c)=0$, yielding a contradiction.

Thus, either $Q(x)>0$ for all $x$ or else $Q(x)<0$ for all $x$. Then

$P(P(x))-x=P(P(x))-P(x)+P(x)-x=Q(P(x))+Q(x)$ for all real $x$.

Since $Q$ never changes sign, both $Q(x)$ and $Q(P(x))$ have the same sign (either positive or negative) so their sum cannot vanish. Hence $P(P(x))\ne x$ for any real $x$.
 
kaliprasad said:
There is no real X for which

$P(X) = x$

for $P(P(x)) = x$ , P(x) cannot be real so complex

$P(x)$ with real coefficient cannot be complex with real $x$

so $P(P(x)) =x $ does not have real solution

I don't follow this argument. Anemone, did you mean $P(x) = x$ in the problem statement? Is $X$ just a typo for $x$ or are $X$ and $x$ distinct?
 
Bacterius said:
I don't follow this argument. Anemone, did you mean $P(x) = x$ in the problem statement? Is $X$ just a typo for $x$ or are $X$ and $x$ distinct?

Ops...yes, I meant $P(x) = x$. Sorry for the typo mistake...
 
Bacterius said:
I don't follow this argument. Anemone, did you mean $P(x) = x$ in the problem statement? Is $X$ just a typo for $x$ or are $X$ and $x$ distinct?

I took x and X different. if this was a typo then my argument does not hold.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K