Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Using Riemann Sums

  • Thread starter Thread starter chicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence of a sequence using Riemann sums, specifically focusing on the inequalities involving sums of reciprocals and integrals. The original poster presents a sequence defined by a sum of terms and attempts to relate it to an integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the inequalities presented by the original poster, questioning the order of integration limits and the correctness of the inequalities. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the sums and the integral, with suggestions to visualize the problem using Riemann sums.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and suggestions for approaching the problem. Some participants express uncertainty about the original inequalities, while others offer guidance on how to visualize the problem through approximations of the integral.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the limits of integration, which some participants believe may be affecting the validity of the inequalities. The original poster expresses difficulty in understanding the concepts involved.

chicky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
show that 1/n+1 +1/n+2 +...1/2n≤from 2n to n∫dt/t≤1/n+...1/2n-1



consider the sequene (Vn) defined by:
Vn= 1/n+1 +...+1/2n=from 2n to p=n+1∑1/p
deduce from above that ln2-1/2n≤ Vn≤ln2




i didnt find any thing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chicky said:
show that 1/n+1 +1/n+2 +...1/2n≤from 2n to n∫dt/t≤1/n+...1/2n-1
Are you saying "Show that
\frac{1}{n+1}+ \frac{1}{n+2}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n}\le \int_{2n}^n\int \frac{dt}{t}\le \frac{1}{n}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n-1}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Looks to me like the integral in the middle will be negative: \int_{2n}^n dt/t= ln(n)- ln(2n)= ln(n/2n)= ln(1/2)= -ln(2)= -0.693147 and that can&#039;t possibly statisfy the sums you give.<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> <b>consider the sequene (Vn) defined by: <br /> Vn= 1/n+1 +...+1/2n=from 2n to p=n+1∑1/p<br /> deduce from above that ln2-1/2n≤ Vn≤ln2<br /> </b><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <b>i didnt find any thing</b> </div> </div> </blockquote>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\frac{1}{n+1}+ \frac{1}{n+2}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n}\le \int_{2n}^n\frac{dt}{t}\le \frac{1}{n}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n-1}
its like this
not two integrals its one integral
 
Chicky, by what you want to deduce it looks like you have your bounds of integration backwards
 
\frac{1}{n+1}+ \frac{1}{n+2}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n}\le \int_{2n}^n\frac{dt}{t}\le \frac{1}{n}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n-1}
we must show this not deduce it
 
Your inequalities aren't true, so you can't "show" this. What Kreizhn is trying to say that you may have your limits of integration in the wrong order (by switching them, the inequalities are then true). Anyway, here's what you should try: consider approximating the area underneath 1/t using n rectangles of width 1 (i.e. all rectangles have their upper right corners on 1/t). Then try approximating the integral by overestimating -- use n rectangles of width 1 but with their upper left corners on 1/t. If you graph 1/t and draw out the rectangles and compute their area, it will be fairly obvious how the inequalities work.
 
am sorry the limit are in the wrong order but the inequality is true am sure
 
Let me clarify. What I meant was: with the incorrect order (limits of integration) the inequalities would (obviously) not be true.

Did you try my hint? This is just an exercise in Riemann sums.
 
i just don't know it
thanks any ways
 
  • #10
You don't know what a Riemann sum is? Or do you mean you just don't want to try what has been suggested?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K