Proving the Divisibility of 5^n by 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter cscott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the divisibility of \(5^n\) by 4, specifically exploring the case for natural numbers \(n\). Participants are examining the mathematical reasoning behind the proof and the implications of their substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial case for \(n = 1\) and attempt to extend the proof to \(n = k + 1\). There are questions about the validity of substitutions made during the manipulation of expressions, particularly regarding the use of different variables for \(x\) and \(y\). Some suggest starting from the expression \(5^{k+1} - 1\) and manipulating it to demonstrate divisibility by 4.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions on how to approach the proof. There is recognition of the need to clarify variable usage and to ensure that the manipulations lead to a valid conclusion regarding divisibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of proving a mathematical statement without assuming prior knowledge of divisibility rules, leading to a focus on careful manipulation of expressions.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
Show that 5^n is divisible by 4 (ie. prove [itex]5^n = 4x[/itex])

The case for n = 1 works

For n = k + 1

[tex]5^{k+1} - 1 = 4x[/tex]
[tex]5^k \cdot 5 - 1 = 4x[/tex]

Then I can only see doing:
[tex]5(5^k - 1 + 1) - 1 = 4x[/tex]
and substituting in the case for n = k
[tex]5(4x + 1) - 1 = 4x[/tex]

But it doesn't work out...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course it doesn't work out, you've used x to mean two different things.

Assume that there exists an x such that 5^k - 1 = 4x.

You then wish to FIND an y such that 5^(k + 1) - 1 = 4y (or at least prove that such a y exists).

It's not necessarily the case that x = y.
 
cscott said:
[tex]5^{k+1} - 1 = 4x[/tex]
...
and substituting in the case for n = k
[tex]5(4x + 1) - 1 = 4x[/tex]

On one hand you're saying [tex]5^{k+1}-1=4x[/tex], then you're substituting [tex]5^{k}-1=4x[/tex]? Both these statements are true for any natural number k, but for different values of [tex]x[/tex] in each.

Suggestion-don't start with what you're trying to prove, just begin with [tex]5^{k+1}-1[/tex] and manipulate it until you get something divisible by 4.
 
I can only manipulate it so far... if I eventually substitute the 4x in I will end up with 20x + 4 (LHS) which is divisible by 4. Is this correct?

If the RHS was 4y instead I'd end up with 5x + 1 = y

If I'm wrong, how do I get past [itex]5^k \cdot 5 - 1[/itex]
 
Last edited:
cscott said:
I can only manipulate it so far... if I eventually substitute the 4x in I will end up with 20x + 4 (LHS) which is divisible by 4. Is this correct?

Exactly, that's all there is to it.
 
Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K