Proving The Hamming Metric: Open Subsets and Basis of X

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around proving properties of the Hamming metric in a metric space defined by sequences of binary values. Participants seek to demonstrate that the set U(d1,...,dp) is an open subset of X and that U serves as a basis for open sets in (X, d). Key points include identifying the structure of open balls in this space and understanding the implications of sequences summing to specific values. The conclusion emphasizes that the ball around (0,0,0,...) with radius 1 is everything except the sequence (1,1,1,...), and the ball around an arbitrary element can be described similarly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and the Hamming metric.
  • Familiarity with open sets and bases in topology.
  • Knowledge of infinite series and convergence.
  • Ability to work with sequences and their properties in mathematical analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric spaces, focusing on completeness and convergence.
  • Learn about the concept of bases for topological spaces and their significance.
  • Explore the implications of the Hamming metric on sequence spaces.
  • Investigate examples of open and closed sets in different metric spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of metric spaces, particularly those involving the Hamming metric and its applications in analysis.

  • #31
Metric_Space said:
at the jth position, say?

For example, yes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I'm thinking it can be written as a combination of other elements in U?
 
  • #33
I don't see how that would help. You need to show that if (x_1,x_2,x_3,...) contains a zero, then

\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}<1

This is really not difficult...

Let's say I have positve real numbers x,y,z>0 such that x+y+z=1, can I infer that x+y<1?
 
  • #34
yes, that makes sense
 
  • #35
yes, so one of x_k is 0 then?
 
  • #36
So, did you figure out why

\sum_{k=0}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}&lt;1

if one of the xk is 0?
 
  • #37
Isn't it because that means the sum above is the difference of two other sums?
 
  • #38
Metric_Space said:
Isn't it because that means the sum above is the difference of two other sums?

I'm not sure what you mean. Which other sums?
 
  • #39
one that sums to one, and one that has a zero at the kth entry?
 
  • #40
Yes, indeed!

So, now we have shown that only (1,1,1,...) has the property that

\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}=1.

So, can you now describe the ball around (0,0,0,...) with radius 1?
 
  • #41
Would it be all entries are 1? But it wouldn't be finite...would it?
 
  • #42
Metric_Space said:
Would it be all entries are 1? But it wouldn't be finite...would it?

No, this isn't correct. I want you to find the set

\left\{(x_1,x_2,x_3,...)~\mid~\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}&lt;1\right\}

So...
 
  • #43
Isn't that just all the (x_1,x_2, ...) minus the entry with (1,1,1,1...)?
 
  • #44
Indeed, so the ball around (0,0,0,...) with radius 1 is everything except (1,1,1,1,...).
So, now the obvious generalization: what is the ball around (a_1,a_2,a_3,...) with radius 1?
 
  • #45
would it be everything but (a_1,a_2, a_3, ...)?
 
  • #46
Uuh, no, I get the impression that you're just guessing here.

Obviously a=(a1,a2,a3,...) will be in the ball, since d(a,a)=0<1.
Moreover, we have just calculated that the ball around (0,0,0,...) is everything but (1,1,1,...). Thus (0,0,0,...) is in the ball...
 
  • #47
...I think I'll need another hint
 
  • #48
For what sequence (x_n)_n, does

\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{|x_k-a_k|}{2^k}}=1

It's basically the same as my last question (when the ak were simply 0). What must hold for |xk-ak| in order for the above series to be 1?
 
  • #49
|X_k-a_k| --> 0 as k--> infinity?
 
  • #50
Metric_Space said:
|X_k-a_k| --> 0 as k--> infinity?

No. I don't know how you got that?
You do know that \frac{1}{2^k}|X_k-a_k|\rightarrow 0, but I fail to see how it is relevant here...
 
  • #51
Oh...does |X_k-a_k|=1 for k=1..infinity?
 
  • #52
Yes! Very good!

So, if |xk-ak|=1, then what will xk be? (Remember that xk and ak can only take on 0 and 1 here).
 
  • #53
x_k=1, a_k=0 or a_k=1,x_k=0 ...is that right?
 
  • #54
Metric_Space said:
x_k=1, a_k=0 or a_k=1,x_k=0 ...is that right?

Very nice! So, basically, ak has the opposite value of xk...
Remark that this correspons nicely with the previous thingies where a was (0,0,0,...), then x was (1,1,1,...).

So, the ball around a with radius 1 is just everything except the "opposite of a")!

Now, we're going to make it a little harder. We're going to figure out what the ball around (0,0,0,...) is with radius 1/2. So, for which vectors does

\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}&lt;\frac{1}{2}

As above, you may remark that it suffices to calculate when equality holds, thus

\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}=\frac{1}{2}

Since if x has a distance of 1/2 of 0, then all vectors with less 1's than x, have distance <1/2. And this is exactly what we wanted...
 
  • #55
Would (x_1,x_2,x_3...) = (0,1,1,...)?
 
  • #56
Metric_Space said:
Would (x_1,x_2,x_3...) = (0,1,1,...)?

Yes that's good, but there is one more possibility!
 
  • #57
oh right...or (1,0,0,0..)
 
  • #58
Yes, very good! So elements in the ball around 0 with radius 1/2 consist of those elements with more zeroes than either (1,0,0,...) or (0,1,1,...).

Now, can you describe the ball around an arbitrary a with radius 1/2?
 
  • #59
balls of radius (1/2)^k have elements

with 1's starting in the kth position and 0's afterwards OR 1's in the (K+1)st position...right?
 
  • #60
Metric_Space said:
balls of radius (1/2)^k have elements

with 1's starting in the kth position and 0's afterwards OR 1's in the (K+1)st position...right?

No, but you have the right idea. What you describe are the sequences such that

\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{x_k}{2^k}}=\frac{1}{2^n}

To describe the balls, you'll need < instead of =. So the balls would be the elements which has less 1's than the elements that you describe.

Also, that only describes the balls around 0. It would be fun if you would find the balls around arbitrary elements...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K