- 22,170
- 3,327
Metric_Space said:at the jth position, say?
For example, yes.
The discussion revolves around the Hamming metric in a metric space context, specifically focusing on proving properties related to open subsets and bases of open sets. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that a certain set U(d1,...,dp) is an open subset of X and that it serves as a basis for open sets in the metric space defined by the Hamming metric.
The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance on how to approach the problem. There is a focus on understanding the structure of open sets and the implications of certain sequences within the metric space.
Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and properties of open sets and the Hamming metric, indicating a need for further exploration of these concepts. There are references to specific sequences and their sums, which are central to the discussion but remain partially unresolved.
Metric_Space said:at the jth position, say?
Metric_Space said:Isn't it because that means the sum above is the difference of two other sums?
Metric_Space said:Would it be all entries are 1? But it wouldn't be finite...would it?
Metric_Space said:|X_k-a_k| --> 0 as k--> infinity?
Metric_Space said:x_k=1, a_k=0 or a_k=1,x_k=0 ...is that right?
Metric_Space said:Would (x_1,x_2,x_3...) = (0,1,1,...)?
Metric_Space said:balls of radius (1/2)^k have elements
with 1's starting in the kth position and 0's afterwards OR 1's in the (K+1)st position...right?