Proving the non-existence of a function.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter m84uily
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
m84uily
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello! I want to know more ways to show the non-existence of the elementary function N(x).
Here's how N(x) is defined:
g(x) : Any elementary function.
[tex]N'(g(x)) = \frac{g(x)}{e^{N(g(x))}}[/tex]

I've only thought of a single way to show this impossibility and it doesn't really develop my understanding of the "why" behind it very well. Here's how I went about it:

If such a function N(x) were to exist then there could also be a function I(x) which could be defined as:
[tex]I(g(x)) = e^{N(g(x))}[/tex]
Which would mean:
[tex]I'(g(x)) = g(x)[/tex]
[tex]\int x^x dx = I(x^x) + C[/tex]
The integral of x^x has been proven irreducible to elementary terms by Marchisotto and Zakeri and therefore N(x) cannot exist for it allows the existence of I(x).

Would anyone else mind posting other lines of reasoning please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m84uily said:
The integral of x^x has been proven irreducible to elementary terms by Marchisotto and Zakeri and therefore N(x) cannot exist for it allows the existence of I(x).

Do not confuse " irreducible to elementary terms" with "cannot exist".
Obviuosly x^x exists, even if it is irreducible to elementary terms.
Similary, N(x) possibly exists even if it is irreducible to elementary terms.
 
Similary, N(x) possibly exists even if it is irreducible to elementary terms.

Well I had said
I want to know more ways to show the non-existence of the elementary function N(x).
Under the specification that N(x) is an elementary function, it cannot exist as I have shown.