Proving Third Isomorphism Theorem: Normal Subgroups and Homomorphisms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the Third Isomorphism Theorem, specifically demonstrating that if M and N are normal subgroups of G with N ≤ M, then (G/N)/(M/N) is isomorphic to G/M. The user simplifies (G/N)/(M/N) to (GM/N) and constructs a homomorphism φ from GM to G/M, sending x to xN. The challenge lies in establishing that φ is surjective, which is addressed by recognizing that each coset of M is a union of cosets of N, thereby confirming the surjectivity of the induced map from G/N to G/M.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically normal subgroups
  • Familiarity with the First Isomorphism Theorem
  • Knowledge of cosets and their properties in group theory
  • Ability to construct and analyze homomorphisms between groups
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Third Isomorphism Theorem in detail
  • Learn about the properties of normal subgroups and their implications
  • Explore examples of homomorphisms and their kernels in group theory
  • Investigate the relationship between cosets and quotient groups
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in abstract algebra, particularly those studying group theory, normal subgroups, and isomorphism theorems. It is also useful for educators looking to clarify these concepts for their students.

moo5003
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Problem:

" Prove (Third Isomorphism THeorem) If M and N are normal subgroups of G and N < or = to M, that (G/N)/(M/N) is isomorphic to G/M."

Work done so far:

Using simply definitions I have simplified (G/N)/(M/N) to (GM/N). Now using the first Isomorphism theorem I want to show that a homomorphism Phi from GM to G/M exists. Such that the Kernal of Phi is N.

I constructed phi such that GM -> G/M
where it sends all x |----> xN.

My problem is as follows: How do I know xN is actually in the set G/M. It may just be that I'm going about the proof in a way that is very complicated then it should be. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright I've been looking at some online proofs and I can see were I went wrong. I should have constructed a phi from G/N to G/M.

My only question is how to show that phi from a gN to a gM is onto G/M. I was looking at the proofs online and they didnt seem to make any sense on this part.
 
The map is I presume the on induced by sending g to [g] its coset in G/M. This is surjective. N is in the kernel so it factors as G-->G/N-->G/M. And the second map must also be surjective.

THinking more concretely, each and every coset of M is a union of cosets of N, so your map from G/N to G/M just identifies these cosets of N.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K