Using the Second Isomorphism (Diamond Isomorphism) Theorem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
DeldotB
Messages
117
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Good day all,

Im completely stumped on how to show this:

|AN|=(|A||N|/A intersect N|)

Here: A and N are subgroups in G and N is a normal subgroup.
I denote the order on N by |N|

Homework Equations


[/B]
Second Isomorphism Theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I know know I am supposed to use the theorem, but I have no idea where to start!
I don't seem how to relate what the theorem says to orders of sets...

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, to be able to use the 2nd isomorphism theorem at all, you need to prove that AN is a subgroup. Has that been given to you as a theorem? If not, can you prove it (it's quite easy)?

Next note that the problem statement only makes sense if A and N are finite.

With those out of the way, the second isomorphism theorem says:

$$AN / N\cong A/A\cap N$$
from which it follows that
$$|AN / N|=| A/A\cap N|$$
You have been asked to prove

$$\frac{|AN|}{|N|}=\frac{|A|}{|A\cap N|}$$

So if you can prove that, for any finite group ##G## and normal subgroup ##N##,
$$|G/N| =\frac{|G|}{|N|}$$
then you're almost done.

Can you prove that? Think about the size ##|gN|## of each coset ##gN##.
 
Ahh! Thanks! I didnt realize I could just divide by |N|...I am new to quotient groups and for some reason I havnen't been able to get the hang of them yet. Thanks!

I'll use Lagranges Theorem for the last part
 
DeldotB said:
Ahh! Thanks! I didnt realize I could just divide by |N|.
You can do that because the equation you've written is just numbers, as everything is enclosed by |.| signs. So no group theory is needed to justify the division.

Actually, the division is only justified if ##|N|\neq 0## but the proposition is untrue otherwise, since the LHS will be 0 and the RHS will be 0/0, which is undefined. So we assume that the examiner meant to stipulate that ##|N|\neq 0##.