Proving U+V is a Subspace of R^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter EV33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the sum of two subsets U and V of R^n, defined as U+V, is a subspace of R^n. The original poster expresses difficulty in demonstrating this property.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster outlines a proof structure based on the criteria for subspaces, including the presence of the zero vector and closure under addition and scalar multiplication. Some participants question the necessity of certain variables introduced in the proof, suggesting a simpler approach may suffice.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the proof requirements and the reasoning behind specific steps. While one participant indicates that the original poster's proof is sufficient, there is an ongoing exploration of the reasoning behind the use of multiple variables in the proof.

Contextual Notes

The original poster identifies themselves as a beginner in linear algebra, which may influence their approach and understanding of the proof requirements.

EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If U and V are subsets of R^n, then the set U+V is
defined by

U+V={x:x=u+v,u in U, and v in V} prove that U and V are subspaces of R^n
then the set U+V is a subspace of R^n.
I am just having trouble proving U+V is a subspace.

Homework Equations



To be a sub-space...
1. it needs to contain the zero vector
2. x+y is in W whenever x and y are in W.
3. ax is in W whenever x is in W and a is any scalar.

The Attempt at a Solution



1. U and V both contain the zero vector, so their sum will also contain the zero vector.
2. any u1 plus u2 should be in U because U is a subspace, and any v1+v2 should be in V becuse V is a subspace. So (u1+v1)+(u2+v2)=(u1+u2)+(v1+v2)=u+v.
3. below is just the matrix u+v times a
a(v1+u1)=av1+au1
(v2+u2)=av2+au2
(v3+u3)=av3+au3

Because u is in U, and v is in V then au must be in U, and av must b in V,
and u+v is in U+V. Therefore a(U+V)must be in U+V.

Is this sufficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's sufficient. Though I'm having a little trouble understanding why you felt you needed u1, u2, u3 and v1, v2, v3 in part 3. a(u+v)=au+av. Isn't that enough?
 
I did that because I am a linear algebra newb lol.

Thanks for the help.
 
EV33 said:
I did that because I am a linear algebra newb lol.

Thanks for the help.

That's a good reason! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K