Invariant subspace and linear transformation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if U is an invariant subspace of V for every linear transformation from V to V, then U must equal V. The proof begins by assuming U is non-trivial and extends a nonzero vector u in U to a basis for V. A linear map k is constructed, demonstrating that all basis vectors of V must also belong to U, leading to the conclusion that U = V. The main challenge identified is establishing the linearity of the transformation k.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of invariant subspaces
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and basis extension
  • Proficiency in linear algebra, particularly dimensionality arguments
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in detail
  • Explore the concept of invariant subspaces in various contexts
  • Learn about basis extension techniques in vector spaces
  • Investigate proofs of linearity for transformations in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on vector spaces, and anyone interested in the properties of linear transformations and invariant subspaces.

td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Let U be a subspace of V. Suppose that U is a invariant subspace of V for every linear
transformation from V to V. Show that U=V.


Homework Equations



no

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume U is not trivial: Now we only need to show that U = V. Let dimV = n: We can choose
a nonzero vector u in U and then extend u to a basis u1,u2,u3,...u{n-1} for V.
There is a linear map k such that
k(u) = u1;
k(u1) = u2;
k(u2) = u3;
...
k(u{n-1})=u
As U is invariant, u1 also in U,then as k(u1)=u2,u2 also in U,.....then u{n-1} also in U.

On the other hand, as u1,u2,u3,...u{n-1} is a basis for V, we have
span(u1,u2,u3,...u{n-1}) = V:
So it follows that U = V.

The difficulty is proving k is a linear transformation, and if it is, is the argument above correct? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds reasonable to me, Apply k to two arbitrary vectors in V and linearity should follow
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K