Proving Uniqueness of Solution for xe^x = 1 between 0<x<1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Firepanda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence and uniqueness of a solution to the equation xe^x = 1 within the interval (0, 1). Participants explore various mathematical approaches to demonstrate these properties, including the use of the Intermediate Value Theorem and Rolle's Theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss changing the equation to x = 1/e^x and iterating to find an approximate solution. Others consider defining a function f(x) = xe^x - 1 and applying the Intermediate Value Theorem to establish the existence of a root. There are also discussions about using Rolle's Theorem to argue for uniqueness and questions about the scope of the uniqueness (whether it applies only in the interval or for all x).

Discussion Status

Some participants express confidence in their reasoning, noting that they have established the existence of a solution and are exploring the uniqueness of that solution. There is a productive exchange regarding the implications of the derivative being positive and the conditions under which the function can cross the x-axis.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to consider the behavior of the function outside the interval [0, 1] and question whether additional limits or properties need to be shown for a complete proof of uniqueness across all x.

Firepanda
Messages
425
Reaction score
0
Show that the equation xe^x = 1 has a solution between 0<x<1.

Well for this I simply changed to x = 1/e^x

Iterated starting with x=1, and got 0.567

Is that the right way to go about this problem?

Then it asks, prove that the solution is unique, which I guess means there is no other solution for the equation but 0.567.

How would I go about this part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok perhaps wrong, another way:

There is a solution where x0 is an element of [0,1]

where f(x) = xe^x - 1

f(0) = -1 < 0 < e^1 - 1 = f(1)

By the intermediate value theroem there exists an x0 in the interval with f(x0) = 0.
Correct?

Still unsure on the second part, think it uses Rolle's theorem.
 
Think I have it:

For a,b in the interval, where a is not equal to b, then f(a) can not be equal to f(b) if x0 is unique.

Then suppose f(a) does equal f(b), apply Rolles theorem:

=> there is an x0 in the interval where f'(x0) = 0

But f'(x) = xe^x + e^x which can never be equal to zero since it is always positive for our interval [0,1] and all positive values of x, which is a contradiction.

Now is the question asking me if the result is unique in the interval or for all x?

Edit: So f'(x) is always posive for [-1,inf). Am i supposed to show the lim x-> -inf or something?
 
Last edited:
yes, what you have done is perfectly good.
 
HallsofIvy said:
yes, what you have done is perfectly good.

Is there a way to show that the solution is unique for all x? i can graph it and see it is, it's monotonic for [-1,inf), do i have to show for all (-inf,-1) that f(x) is always negative?
 
Firepanda said:
Think I have it:

For a,b in the interval, where a is not equal to b, then f(a) can not be equal to f(b) if x0 is unique.

Then suppose f(a) does equal f(b), apply Rolles theorem:

=> there is an x0 in the interval where f'(x0) = 0

But f'(x) = xe^x + e^x which can never be equal to zero since it is always positive for our interval [0,1] and all positive values of x, which is a contradiction.

Now is the question asking me if the result is unique in the interval or for all x?

Edit: So f'(x) is always posive for [-1,inf). Am i supposed to show the lim x-> -inf or something?

Since you have shown that f(0) = -1, f(1) > 0, and f'(x) > for x in [0, 1], so f(x) = 0 for only a single value. A function whose derivative is positive on an interval can't cross the x-axis more than once on that interval.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K