Proving x^2-c^2*t^2 invariance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter durand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on proving the invariance of the expression x² - c²t² under Lorentz transformations. Participants explore various approaches to demonstrate this invariance, including substitution and manipulation of the terms involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest substituting x and t with their transformed counterparts x' and t' to prove the invariance.
  • One participant mentions that after substitution, the terms should cancel out to show the invariance.
  • Another participant claims to have found a solution by factoring out terms and utilizing the gamma factor.
  • There is a contention regarding the general case, where one participant argues that the invariance does not hold in all scenarios and requires more rigorous calculations.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake regarding differentiation, stating that the invariance can be shown directly through substitution.
  • Another participant expresses interest in the topic, indicating it may be part of their upcoming studies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are competing views on the generality of the invariance and the methods required to prove it. Some participants believe the invariance can be shown simply, while others argue for a more complex approach.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the conditions under which the invariance holds, and there are references to special cases that may not apply universally. The role of the gamma factor and its cancellation is also a point of contention.

durand
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
How do you prove x2-c2t2 is invariant under the lorentz transformations given that;
78195e8f63116bf11b2bbef574fbcc25.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ive tried the obvious replacing x and t with x' and t' but i still can't get it to drop out :(
 
durand said:
Ive tried the obvious replacing x and t with x' and t' but i still can't get it to drop out :(

In x'^2 - ct'^2, replace x' and t' be the expressions that you gave in the original post, and factor x^2 and t^2 out of terms in which they occur.
 
Try again. I just worked it out and found that c2t2-x2=c2t'2-x'2.
 
You need to prove that

[tex](x^{\prime})^2 - c^2 (t^{\prime})^2 = x^2 - c^2 t^2[/tex]

After substituting the Lorentz transformation on the left side, everything should eventually cancel out.
 
Thanks everyone! I didn't see that gamma could be taken out of the equation and cancelled. It works now :D
 
What you've done is a special case, in the general case, x^2-(ct)^2 is a constant and gamma does not cancel out, the calc is a bit rigorous then, you need to differentiate and substitute v
 
Ok, I'l definitely keep that in mind! Thanks.
 
Oops, mistake.No differentiation.The invariance yields directly by substituting LT.
I differentiated x^2-(ct)^2=k and substituted v , but that's again a special case when v is the velocity of the object in the unprimed frame
 
  • #10
Mmm, ok. I think I might be doing that next semester at uni.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K