Pulley friction in a overhead crane

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marinel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crane Friction Pulley
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on adjusting the safety trip of an overhead crane to 110% of its nominal load, specifically 143 tons. Users highlight the issue of measuring only 135 tons when attempting to lift 143 tons due to friction in the pulley system. Solutions proposed include adjusting the safety trip threshold based on the direction of operation or lowering the threshold to prevent exceeding the load limit. The primary concern is the friction force affecting load measurements, necessitating a review of the pulley bearings and overall system efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of overhead crane safety mechanisms
  • Knowledge of pulley systems and friction forces
  • Familiarity with load measurement devices, specifically Load Pin Cells
  • Basic principles of mechanical engineering related to load calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods to measure load accurately using Load Pin Cells
  • Investigate the impact of pulley friction on load measurement accuracy
  • Explore safety trip adjustment techniques for overhead cranes
  • Learn about maintenance procedures for pulley systems and bearings
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, crane operators, safety inspectors, and maintenance personnel involved in overhead crane operations and safety compliance.

Marinel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I need to adjust the safety trip at 110% of the nominal load ( 130 tons ).
This means that I need to load the overhead crane with 143 Tons. With this load on the floor I start to rise the load with the crane, but I measure less than those 143 Tons ( say 135 Tons). This means that we can never achive the value os 143 Tons unless we stop the rising movement.
I want to know what to do.
In the atached file you can see the overall arrangement of the pulleys in the overhead crane and also values achived on the real test ( separate sheet). The load has 130 tons.
In order to check the maths involved I developed several equations to show the different forces involved and the efficiency of the system ( note that f is the friction force in each pulley).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I forgot the file
 

Attachments

I don't understand what you want. You want to load the crane with 143 tons, but you don't have 143 tons to load it with?
 
Surely you need to suspend a calibrated load slightly smaller than your max just above the floor and gently add calibrated pigs until the trip operates?
Adjust the trip setting as appropriate.
Repeat this until the trip setting is acceptable.

This will void the snatch effect you are referring to.
 
Marinel said:
I need to adjust the safety trip at 110% of the nominal load ( 130 tons ).
This means that I need to load the overhead crane with 143 Tons. With this load on the floor I start to rise the load with the crane, but I measure less than those 143 Tons ( say 135 Tons). This means that we can never achive the value os 143 Tons unless we stop the rising movement.
I want to know what to do.
In the atached file you can see the overall arrangement of the pulleys in the overhead crane and also values achived on the real test ( separate sheet). The load has 130 tons.
In order to check the maths involved I developed several equations to show the different forces involved and the efficiency of the system ( note that f is the friction force in each pulley).

To summarize your dilemma:

- You want to protect all ropes with a single safety trip that measures just two of the eight rope forces.
- Due to friction the forces on the not measured ropes can be higher or lower than on the measured ones, depending on the operation direction (rise/lower)

Solutions:

- Make the safety trip threshold dependent on operation direction (probably complicated)
- Make the threshold so low that no rope can exceed the load it has at rest for 143ton, regardless of the operation direction (will limit the crane more)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your contributions!
Could you tell me if the developed formulas are correct?
 
Drakkith said:
I don't understand what you want. You want to load the crane with 143 tons, but you don't have 143 tons to load it with?

Drakkith,
I want to load the crane with 143 Tons in order to adjust the trip relay ( to avoid manipulation of the crane with that load or bigger).
But due to friction (?) if i load the crane with 143 tons I start to measure 135 tons !
If for instance I can adjust the trip for 143 tons, later on the crane operator can lift 145 tons and the system allow it because it stats to measure ( say 137 tons) which is in the limit allowed. Only when he stops the movement the system measures the real load and than trips ( too late!)
 
Ah ok I see now. Can you connect the cables to a device which will connect with the load and weigh it accurately, tripping a switch if the load is above the set amount? Or does this need to be built into the crane itself?
 
Drakkith said:
Ah ok I see now. Can you connect the cables to a device which will connect with the load and weigh it accurately, tripping a switch if the load is above the set amount? Or does this need to be built into the crane itself?

The mesure device is a Load Pin Cell located in the shaft of pulley nº 5 which does not move at all. I cannot introduce any extra device on the rope because it will moves and can smahed against pulleys.
If my formulas are right then it is a friction problem and because the friction is too high therefore I need to disassemble the pulleys system and check all the bearings of the pulleys. The main question is if I am wrong it will be too mutch cost for nothing!
 
  • #10
Marinel said:
The mesure device is a Load Pin Cell located in the shaft of pulley nº 5 which does not move at all. I cannot introduce any extra device on the rope because it will moves and can smahed against pulleys.
If my formulas are right then it is a friction problem and because the friction is too high therefore I need to disassemble the pulleys system and check all the bearings of the pulleys. The main question is if I am wrong it will be too mutch cost for nothing!

That's not what I meant, but I see your problem. Wish I could help!
 
  • #11
Drakkith said:
That's not what I meant, but I see your problem. Wish I could help!

Any news?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K