Pulley Question - Are the axes wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cipotilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axes Pulley
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving pulleys and the correct application of Newton's second law. The main issue identified is the direction of the frictional force, which must oppose the direction of motion. Participants clarify that while one can initially assume a direction for motion, the presence of friction means that incorrect assumptions can lead to wrong answers. It is emphasized that consistency in the direction of forces is crucial, particularly when friction is involved. The conclusion drawn is that the direction of motion cannot be arbitrarily chosen when friction is a factor in the problem.
cipotilla
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Pulley Question - Are the axes wrong??

Homework Statement


Please see problem # 2 in the attached document.

Homework Equations


Newtons second Law

The Attempt at a Solution


See the two last pages of the attachment, I have attempted a complete solution but my answer is incorrect, I have reviewed the math and I don't think I made a mistake there, is the axes system wrong??
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have the frictional force acting in the wrong direction on each of your free body diagrams. It will act in the opposite direction of motion, right? So looking at the system, which way to you think the blocks will move when they are released?

By the way: It's no big deal if you pick the wrong direction for the motion of the blocks. You will just end up with a negative acceleration. The important thing is to make sure all of your forces are consistent with whatever coordinate system you choose.
 
Last edited:
Block A would move down and B would move up. But if I assume its the otherway around, shouldn't the calculations still work out as long as I am consistant? By consistant I mean, that I say instead that A moves up and B moves down and I place all the forces in the directions according to this assumption instead. Why doesn't it work out this way?
 
"Block A would move down and B would move up. But if I assume its the otherway around, shouldn't the calculations still work out as long as I am consistant? By consistant I mean, that I say instead that A moves up and B moves down and I place all the forces in the directions according to this assumption instead. Why doesn't it work out this way?"

Yes, I just finished editing my post to mention that. LOL

If you assume Block A is going to move downwards, your direction for the friction in your diagram is incorrect. Friction acts in the opposite direction to what you have drawn. (since it opposes motion)
 
OK wait, I just looked harder at your diagram, and I see the arrows you have there showing the direction of motion. They look right. Let me look at it some more...
 
cipotilla said:
Block A would move down and B would move up. But if I assume its the otherway around, shouldn't the calculations still work out as long as I am consistant? By consistant I mean, that I say instead that A moves up and B moves down and I place all the forces in the directions according to this assumption instead. Why doesn't it work out this way?
As long as you have the forces acting in the correct directions, your initial choice of acceleration direction is arbitrary: if you guess wrong, your answer will come out negative. But things aren't so simple when friction is involved, since the direction of friction depends on the direction of motion. If you choose the wrong initial direction of motion, then your friction forces are not in the correct direction and you'll get a wrong answer.

Think about a simpler problem: A block sliding on an incline with friction. It makes all the difference in the world whether the block is going up or down. The acceleration will be totally different in each case, not just off by a sign.

In your problem, you tacitly assumed that block A goes up. When you found a negative acceleration, that should tell you that your original assumption of direction of motion was incorrect and inconsistent with your assumed direction of friction forces.
 
I see, thank you. I'll redo the problem now that I've learned that when friction is involved one cannot arbitrarily choose the direction of motion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K