- 42,822
- 10,503
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?Adesh said:Accelerations of block A and block B.
The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving pulleys and two blocks, A and B. The original poster seeks to determine the accelerations of both blocks, given the gravitational force acting on block B and the assumption that the masses of the pulleys and strings are negligible. The poster initially calculates the accelerations but finds them to be incorrect, prompting a request for clarification on the mistakes made in their reasoning.
Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the relationships between the blocks' accelerations and the constraints imposed by the lengths of the strings. There is a recognition that the blocks do not share the same acceleration, and some guidance has been provided regarding the use of constraint equations and the significance of the second derivatives of the lengths of the strings.
There is an ongoing discussion about the correct interpretation of the forces and accelerations involved, with some participants suggesting that the original poster's calculations may be based on incorrect assumptions about the system's dynamics. The conversation includes references to the need for a deeper understanding of the relationships between the blocks and the constraints of the system.
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?Adesh said:Accelerations of block A and block B.
Another way to look at this problem:Adesh said:...
Please explain me as I have no reason to believe that block A and B will have same acceleration.
Acceleration of the blocks.haruspex said:So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
But there is something that is troubling me, ##(-l_1, 0)## is the current position of the block A and ##(0, -l_2)## is the current position of block B, but acceleration is not the second derivative of fixed positions (because in that case it will always come out to be zero). We should say, that at ##t=0## the positions of the blocks were so and so.haruspex said:So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
You did not define l1 etc. as merely initial positions. Why should they not mean positions at time t, i.e. define l1 = l1(t) etc.Adesh said:But there is something that is troubling me, ##(-l_1, 0)## is the current position of the block A and ##(0, -l_2)## is the current position of block B, but acceleration is not the second derivative of fixed positions (because in that case it will always come out to be zero). We should say, that at ##t=0## the positions of the blocks were so and so.
Yes, this advice and way of solving it is helping me very much. Now, I’m able to solve almost all problems of pulleys and strings, credit goes to you.haruspex said:You did not define l1 etc. as merely initial positions. Why should they not mean positions at time t, i.e. define l1 = l1(t) etc.
Also, you don't need to use vector representations. Just define each displacement in the direction that suits it.