What's my mistake in this problem in dynamics involving pulleys?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving pulleys and two blocks, A and B. The original poster seeks to determine the accelerations of both blocks, given the gravitational force acting on block B and the assumption that the masses of the pulleys and strings are negligible. The poster initially calculates the accelerations but finds them to be incorrect, prompting a request for clarification on the mistakes made in their reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on each block, particularly the gravitational force on block B and the tension in the strings. There is an exploration of how to set up force equations for both blocks and the implications of the tension being distributed across the strings. Some participants question the assumption that the tension is simply half of the gravitational force on block B.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the relationships between the blocks' accelerations and the constraints imposed by the lengths of the strings. There is a recognition that the blocks do not share the same acceleration, and some guidance has been provided regarding the use of constraint equations and the significance of the second derivatives of the lengths of the strings.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the correct interpretation of the forces and accelerations involved, with some participants suggesting that the original poster's calculations may be based on incorrect assumptions about the system's dynamics. The conversation includes references to the need for a deeper understanding of the relationships between the blocks and the constraints of the system.

  • #31
Adesh said:
Accelerations of block A and block B.
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Adesh said:
...
Please explain me as I have no reason to believe that block A and B will have same acceleration.
Another way to look at this problem:
A moveable pulley can be considered as a second class lever with mechanical advantage of 2.

Moveable-pulley-as-second-class-lever.svg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh
  • #33
haruspex said:
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
Acceleration of the blocks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #34
haruspex said:
So what equation do you get by carrying out the differentiation in post #16?
But there is something that is troubling me, ##(-l_1, 0)## is the current position of the block A and ##(0, -l_2)## is the current position of block B, but acceleration is not the second derivative of fixed positions (because in that case it will always come out to be zero). We should say, that at ##t=0## the positions of the blocks were so and so.
 
  • #35
Adesh said:
But there is something that is troubling me, ##(-l_1, 0)## is the current position of the block A and ##(0, -l_2)## is the current position of block B, but acceleration is not the second derivative of fixed positions (because in that case it will always come out to be zero). We should say, that at ##t=0## the positions of the blocks were so and so.
You did not define l1 etc. as merely initial positions. Why should they not mean positions at time t, i.e. define l1 = l1(t) etc.
Also, you don't need to use vector representations. Just define each displacement in the direction that suits it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Adesh and Delta2
  • #36
haruspex said:
You did not define l1 etc. as merely initial positions. Why should they not mean positions at time t, i.e. define l1 = l1(t) etc.
Also, you don't need to use vector representations. Just define each displacement in the direction that suits it.
Yes, this advice and way of solving it is helping me very much. Now, I’m able to solve almost all problems of pulleys and strings, credit goes to you.

I think these pulleys and strings problems are archetypical, textbooks on Newtonian Mechanics (like French’s Mechanics, Univeristy Physics) don’t actaully teach it exclusively.

Now, I’m into elevator problems :confused:.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
891
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
720
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K