Pump water from multiple tanks under vacuum by common pump?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Pumping water from three vacuum tanks at different vacuum levels into a single atmospheric tank using a common pump and suction header is feasible, provided proper design considerations are implemented. The tanks, elevated 10 feet above the atmospheric tank, can achieve a flow rate of approximately 500 Litres/hr each through a 1/2 inch line. Check valves are recommended on the exit lines to prevent backflow and ensure system stability. If vacuum levels are stronger and none of the tanks are self-draining, the pumping scheme remains viable, but careful management of pressure differentials is essential to avoid cross-contamination.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vacuum systems and pressure differentials
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics and flow rates
  • Knowledge of piping design and sizing
  • Experience with check valve applications in fluid systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research vacuum pump selection criteria for multi-tank systems
  • Learn about fluid dynamics principles related to pressure profiles in piping
  • Study the effects of check valves on flow and backflow prevention
  • Explore advanced pumping strategies for varying vacuum levels
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid mechanics specialists, and system designers involved in vacuum systems and fluid transport applications will benefit from this discussion.

rollingstein
Messages
644
Reaction score
16
Is it possible to pump out water from three tanks all under a different vacuum level using a common pump and common suction header? Or would this arrangement cause problems? The destination is a single tank at atmospheric pressure.

See Sketch below.

I'm trying to intuitively figure how the pressure profile in the piping would look like.

D9WD7cD.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Flow rates? Line lengths and sizes?
 
Bystander said:
Flow rates? Line lengths and sizes?

Tanks are all next to each other. Line length is approx. 100 ft total from anyone vacuum tank till the atm tank. Where to keep pump etc. is flexible. All three vacuum tanks are elevated approximately 10 feet above the atmospheric tank.

Flow rates are low; approx. 500 Litres/hr from each tank. Line size is flexible too but I was thinking 1/2 inch would be generous.

Basically, three condensate accumulations have to be emptied out & I was wondering if I could do with one pump instead of three separate ones.
 
rollingstein said:
10 feet above the atmospheric tank.
Check valves on the exit lines? One and two are going to be self-draining, and three is the only one that will require pumping.
 
Bystander said:
Check valves on the exit lines? One and two are going to be self-draining, and three is the only one that will require pumping.

Makes sense thanks.

Out of curiosity what if the vacuum levels were stronger. i.e. none of the tanks were self draining. Would this pumping scheme work then?

Say assume 300, 200, 100 mmHg?

I'm always hesitant to count on a gravity head for draining. That's why a pump would give me a margin of safety. But what I worry hear is a higher vacuum tank pulling from another via the interconnections.
 
How bad do things get if you get backflow into your process/condensate lines feeding these tanks?
 
Bystander said:
How bad do things get if you get backflow into your process/condensate lines feeding these tanks?

Not very bad. It won't be a disaster if there's any intermittent cross contamination.

So long as, on average, in the long run I can stabilize the system without any inter-flows.
 
Poster was warned about hijacking threads
Hi,

Let's say I have an air compressor. If I compress exactly one kilogram of air at STP, I mean the total mass of the sealed tank is one kilogram plus the mass of the tank when empty, it will take a fixed amount of energy to do that. Now suppose my compressor is located at 1km up in the atmosphere. I also operate it to compress exactly one kilogram of air into the empty tank. My question is this; does it take exactly the same amount of energy to compress the same mass of air into the tank regardless of altitude or does the energy required to compress exactly one kilogram of air increase at an altitude of say 1km?

Or more simply put, does it take more energy to compress the same amount of air at altitude and if so, does that extra energy exactly correlate to the gravitational potential energy ?Thanks.
 
Last edited:
What stops the three source tanks trying to equalise their pressures?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
950
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K