Pythagorean theorem based on cross product.

[tony700]

I was developing a pythagorean theorem proof based on the cross product of two vectors..Below is my final solution...My problem is I had to get around using the distance/magnitude formula because that is using the pythagorean theorem to prove the pythagorean theorem. But after searching, it may be true that the cross product itself is a generalization of the pythagorean theorem. I'm asking anyone to look at this proof who is real saavy with Linear Algebra and vectors to let me know if cross-product can or cannot be used to prove the pythagorean theorem..My final solution to ascertain the distance of the orthogonal vector, was to use a number line and absolute value based on the standard conventions of the orthogonal vector itself. Thank you for any help?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/202754816/3-d-Cross-Product-Proof-3-Vectors-Orthogonal-Solution

 

[Office_Shredder]

I think asserting the length of X to be \sqrt{A^2+B^2} is fine. It's not immediately clear how you actually proved the pythagorean theorem though, since you haven't drawn any right triangles whose sides and hypotenuse have been calculated.

The statement that |YxZ| = area of parallelogram is far from obvious to me given that you are restricting yourself to never using the pythagorean theorem.

 

[tony700]

Yes, you pointed out a major flaw in this one...I forgot to put the other points in space to delineate it as a right triangle...How does this look?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/203932954/3-d-Cross-Product-Proof-Math-is-Art-Pythagorean-Theorem-Proof

 

[FactChecker]

The Pythagorean theorem is so fundamental that I would be very surprised if much of math in your proof did not depend on it. I don't know if you have seen the proof of his theorem, but it is very basic. He proved it before the number system was even a system. Fractions were not understood. He thought it was a religion.

I can't resist recommending this for your Pythagorean entertainment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1E7I7_r3Cw