Q regarding Quantum decoherence, r.e. double slit experiment

Click For Summary
Quantum decoherence can be experimentally demonstrated with simple setups, such as low-power lightbulbs and sensors. Removing the plywood from the double slit experiment raises questions about the resulting patterns on a detection screen. It is suggested that without intervening structures, single electrons would produce a random scatter on the end plate. However, with a larger detection area, like a cinema screen, it is theorized that patterns may emerge over time, potentially resembling concentric circles when unobserved and shaded circles when observed. This discussion highlights the complexities of quantum behavior and the influence of observation on particle-wave duality.
VCortex
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

My limited knowledge of quantum decoherence leads me to believe that it can be demonstrated experimentally via rather humble apparatus involving low power lightbulbs, a few sensors, & some plywood with holes in & some switches etc.

I was just wondering what kind of pattern you get if you removed the plywood bit of the experiment; do you get a totally random scatter in an undefinable area, a random scatter within a circumference, a shaded circle diffusing towards the edge, a picture of Elvis etc?

Preemptive thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I know my nooby question is being battled out elsewhere (it's kind of hard to know where to insert yourself with all the different opinions and ideas floating around), but this has got to be an easy question for someone to give a solid answer to hasn't it!?

So far from other posts, I gather that a single electron with no intervening structure would have a random scatter at the end plate, right? Very particular.
So, let's say we have the same apparatus, but the end plate is bigger (like a cinema screen, we can call it the Big Screen Electron Absorptionator).

Surely, at some scale, if the individually fired electrons want to behave as both a particle and a wave, you will after a time develop patterns something like a concentric circle pattern unobserved, and something like a shaded circle when observed, assuming the energy scales involved are detectible? Anyone?
 
Last edited:
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
799
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K