QCD Meson Potential: Physics Community Agreement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BigD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qcd
BigD
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Has the physics community come to an agreement on the form an approximate potential function would take for the strong force in a meson?

I am just starting out as a physics major, but I have been reading a few books on basic quantum theory and QFT. I am currently reading a book on particle physics that was written in the 80's, and it talks about several forms that the potential could take in a meson such as a charm-anticharm. I would greatly appreciate it if anyone could provide some up to date information on this subject.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The so called "Cornell potential" has been used. It looks like
V=-g^2/r + ar. Sometmes a ln(r) is used instead of ar.
 
Thank you.

Have experimentalists been unable to determine which of the two fits better as of yet?
 
Nobody has been able to show on paper that confinement does exist. It is all speculation at this point that the potential function is given by the Cornell potential or something similar to it. Well, you have lattice simulations but they are not very convincing, at least to me.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top