QCD & Weak Theory: Furry's Theorem & Beyond

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Furry's theorem in the context of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and weak theory, specifically regarding the contributions of fermion loops to various vertex functions. Participants explore whether similar principles apply to QCD as in quantum electrodynamics (QED) and discuss the implications for three-gluon and three-boson vertices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Ivan questions whether Furry's theorem holds for QCD and weak theory, specifically regarding non-zero contributions from fermion loops.
  • Some participants clarify that the term "QCD of weak theory" should be interpreted as an "or," indicating a distinction between the two theories.
  • One participant suggests that gluon fusion producing a Higgs boson exemplifies a scenario involving both strong and weak interactions, involving a three-vertex fermion loop.
  • Another participant argues that the process has an even total expression under charge conjugation due to the presence of two vector currents and a scalar current.
  • It is noted that diagrams with an odd number of gluon external legs connected to internal fermion lines will vanish, similar to QED.
  • Participants discuss the color structure of the diagrams, indicating that certain symmetric components vanish while others remain, leading to a non-zero contribution proportional to the structure constants.
  • There is a discussion about the setup of calculations for three external gluons and the implications of loop momenta running in opposite directions, leading to a vanishing sum of certain diagrams.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the calculation setup and corrects their earlier statements about the current's eigenstate properties.
  • Another participant expresses interest in computing the full contributions, including ghosts and gluons, for the three-point function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of Furry's theorem to QCD and weak theory, with some agreeing on certain aspects of the calculations while others challenge or refine earlier claims. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact contributions and implications of the various diagrams.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of calculations in QCD compared to QED, including the necessity to account for gluons and ghosts in loops and the presence of additional topologies.

izh-21251
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Hello, everyone!

I have a short question. I think everybody knows the Furry theorem for QED, which tells, in particular, that fermion loops with odd number of fermions always give 0.

Does the same true for QCD of weak theory? Can one have non-zero contribution to 3-gluon vertex (or 3-boson vertex) from 3-quark (3-lepton) loop with strong (weak) vertices.

Thanks,
Ivan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"QCD of weak theory"? I guess that should be an "or".

Gluon fusion to produce a Higgs is an example of strong plus weak interaction with a 3-vertex fermion loop (top is dominating).
 
mfb said:
"QCD of weak theory"? I guess that should be an "or".

Gluon fusion to produce a Higgs is an example of strong plus weak interaction with a 3-vertex fermion loop (top is dominating).

Yes but that process has two vector currents and a scalar current, so the total expression is even under charge conjugation. A three gluon loop would contribute a ##C## odd combination of vector currents.

The same logic for Furry's theorem in QED works for Yang-Mills theory. Diagrams with an odd number of (only) gluon external legs connected directly to internal fermion lines will vanish. Your point is well taken that you restrict to the class of diagrams that are nonzero because of scalar and gluon self-interaction vertices.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and izh-21251
I need to check on paper. But it's the same with the exception that we get a trace of ( ta tb tc) , and the other diagram with a minus sign is (ta tc tb). So I think the symmetric colour structure d_abc piece vanishes and the f_abc piece is left over.
 
RGevo said:
I need to check on paper. But it's the same with the exception that we get a trace of ( ta tb tc) , and the other diagram with a minus sign is (ta tc tb). So I think the symmetric colour structure d_abc piece vanishes and the f_abc piece is left over.

If you setup the calculation for the 3 external gluons coming out of a fermion triangle there are really two diagrams with the loop momenta running in opposite directions. Because of the color labels we need to consider both of them. Since the fermion propagators are linear in momenta, you'll find the amplitudes come in with the opposite sign. So the sum of the two graphs actually vanishes.
 
fzero said:
If you setup the calculation for the 3 external gluons coming out of a fermion triangle there are really two diagrams with the loop momenta running in opposite directions. Because of the color labels we need to consider both of them. Since the fermion propagators are linear in momenta, you'll find the amplitudes come in with the opposite sign. So the sum of the two graphs actually vanishes.
Hi fzero,

So are you saying what I wrote is wrong?

In one diagram I should get Tr{ tA tB tC}, while in the other I get Tr{ tA tC tB}.

So for the first I get 1/4( i fABC + dABD) and in the second I get 1/4( -i fABC + dABD ). Therefore, when I sum up the two diagrams (which have opposite sign like i said in the first place), I get something proportional to 1/2 i fABC. I guess something like this is expected, since in colour structure (if these were very massive fermions which were integrated out as in an effective interaction) this would lead to something like the three gluon vertex.

Anyway, in QCD its of course never as straightforward, since for the three point function it is also necessary to include gluons and ghosts in the loops. There are also extra topologies compared to QED where there are 4-gluon vertices. [Edit: I notice fzero already wrote about this above]
 
Last edited:
RGevo said:
Hi fzero,

So are you saying what I wrote is wrong?

You are correct. After setting the calculation up I find the same factors that you do. My post about the calculation using currents is also incorrect, since the color index on the fermions prevents the current from being an eigenstate of charge conjugation. Thank you for following up on this.
 
No problem. I was just a little confused as to whether I'd done something stupid.

It's actually a bit more interesting than I initially thought, so I might compute the full thing (ghosts and gluons) for the three point. If I find anything interesting I'll post back!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K