The vertex factors in QCD penguin operators

In summary, (V+A) is included in Eqtns(5.4) as part of the projection operator for the right Weyl from a Dirac spinor. According to the Feynman rules of electroweak theory, there is a (V-A) assigned to each (Dirac) spinor-W boson vertex, but in penguin diagrams with a quark-antiquark loop coupling to the W, both vertices may have the same (V-A) factor. However, if the goal is to put constraints on a potential V+A interaction or component, it is necessary for it to be included.
  • #1
Elmo
38
6
TL;DR Summary
Not sure why there is a (V+A) term in here.
Have a look at O5 & O6 in Eqtns(5.4) . Why is there a (V+A) ?
(V+A) contains the projection operator which projects out the right Weyl from a Dirac spinor.
As per the Feynman rules of electroweak theory, there is a (V-A) assigned to each (Dirac) spinor-W boson vertex because W only couple to left Weyl spinors.
In the corresponding penguin diagrams there is the quark-antiquark loop coupling to the W so shouldn't both vertices have the same (V-A) factor always ?
Screenshot (51).png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Elmo said:
Summary:: Not sure why there is a (V+A) term in here.

so shouldn't both vertices have the same (V-A) factor always ?

Maybe. You didn't post enough for us to see what is being calculated. We therefore can't tell what should or should not be there.
 
  • Like
Likes Elmo
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
Maybe. You didn't post enough for us to see what is being calculated. We therefore can't tell what should or should not be there.
oh sorry.np Here it is.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (53).png
    Screenshot (53).png
    51.5 KB · Views: 167
  • Screenshot (54).png
    Screenshot (54).png
    43.5 KB · Views: 173
  • Screenshot (55).png
    Screenshot (55).png
    40 KB · Views: 160
  • #4
You still haven't shown us what is being calculated. Why this slow drip...drip..drip of information?

If the goal is, for example, to put constraints on a potential V+A interaction or component, of course it needs to be there.
 
  • #5
Vanadium 50 said:
You still haven't shown us what is being calculated. Why this slow drip...drip..drip of information?

If the goal is, for example, to put constraints on a potential V+A interaction or component, of course it needs to be there.
oh actually no,I think its all clear now.
Sorry for bugging ye all.
Thanks anyway.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top