QED perturbation series convergence versus exact solutions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the perturbation series in quantum electrodynamics (QED), specifically referencing Dyson's argument that it has a zero radius of convergence. The participants explore the divergence of the series, the potential existence of exact solutions to QED, and the implications of non-perturbative effects, such as instantons in Yang-Mills theory. It is concluded that the Landau pole suggests QED may be inconsistent as a standalone theory, which likely precludes the existence of exact solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with Dyson's argument regarding series convergence
  • Knowledge of Feynman diagrams and their role in visualizing perturbation theory
  • Concept of non-perturbative effects and instantons in Yang-Mills theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Landau pole in quantum field theories
  • Study non-perturbative effects in quantum electrodynamics
  • Explore the concept of instantons and their significance in Yang-Mills theory
  • Investigate alternative approaches to finding exact solutions in quantum field theories
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and researchers interested in the limitations of perturbation theory and the quest for exact solutions in quantum electrodynamics.

Claustral
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
It is well known due to the famous argument by Dyson that the perturbation series for quantum electrodynamics has zero radius of convergence. Dysons argument essentially goes like that: If the power series in α had a finite (r>0) radius of convergence it also would converge for some small negative α (fine structure constant). This, however, leads to a contradiction since for negative α like charges would attract each other and this essentially renders the theory unstable for negative α.

I have three questions in connection with this:

First of all, is it possible to estimate at which order n the series will begin to diverge? Do we have a limit beyond which it does not make sense to use perturbation theory for QED any more and is this limit wihtin reach?

Secondly, even though we cannot explicitly state an exact solution, can we at least prove or do we know that there is an exact solution for this theory or can it be the case that mathematically there is no exact solution to QED at all?

Thirdly, it is well known that the different terms of the perturbation series are visualized via Feynman diagrams and that these diagrams lead to the picture of virtual particles being exchanged. Now, in case of an exact solution: Can we make any statement about a particle concept there? Are a finite number of particles involved? Does it make sense to talk about particles at all? Will there be things like virtual particles? Or do we simply know nothing at all with respect to exact solutions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sure others know much more about this, but I think a rule of thumb may be that we expect there to be non-perturbative effects which are suppressed by a factor that looks like ##\exp(-1 / g^2)## where g is the coupling constant. For example, the BPST instanton in Yang-Mills theory has action ##8 \pi^2 / g^2## and so should be suppressed by ##\exp(-8 \pi^2 / g^2)##. These instantons are completely invisible in perturbation theory, and you can see why if you try to construct a power series for ##\exp(-8 \pi^2 / g^2)## around g = 0. So I'd expect problems with perturbation theory to show up at least by the time you reach this level of precision.

Regarding your second question, I think the Landau pole is generally taken to mean that QED is probably inconsistent, at least as a standalone theory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landau_pole . I think this would preclude the existence of any exact solutions.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K